CSNDX.MI vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ).
CSNDX.MI and QQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSNDX.MI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999. Both CSNDX.MI and QQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CSNDX.MI or QQQ.
Correlation
The correlation between CSNDX.MI and QQQ is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CSNDX.MI vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CSNDX.MI:
1.85
QQQ:
1.37
CSNDX.MI:
2.46
QQQ:
1.86
CSNDX.MI:
1.35
QQQ:
1.25
CSNDX.MI:
2.38
QQQ:
1.84
CSNDX.MI:
7.87
QQQ:
6.35
CSNDX.MI:
4.07%
QQQ:
3.92%
CSNDX.MI:
17.40%
QQQ:
18.24%
CSNDX.MI:
-31.19%
QQQ:
-82.98%
CSNDX.MI:
0.00%
QQQ:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSNDX.MI achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 5.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CSNDX.MI having a 18.95% annualized return and QQQ not far behind at 18.38%.
CSNDX.MI
4.16%
2.57%
20.03%
32.03%
19.62%
18.95%
QQQ
5.53%
3.41%
12.16%
27.01%
19.41%
18.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSNDX.MI vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSNDX.MI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CSNDX.MI vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CSNDX.MI
QQQ
CSNDX.MI vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CSNDX.MI vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
CSNDX.MI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSNDX.MI iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ | 0.53% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% | 1.41% |
Drawdowns
CSNDX.MI vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSNDX.MI drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSNDX.MI and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CSNDX.MI vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to Invesco QQQ (QQQ) at 4.67%. This indicates that CSNDX.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.