CSM vs. CLSE

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CSM (Proshares Large Cap Core Plus) and CLSE (Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF) are both Long-Short funds. CSM is passively managed, while CLSE is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CSM returned 20.59%/yr vs 31.13%/yr for CLSE. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSM charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for CLSE.

Performance

CSM vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSM achieves a 5.82% return, which is significantly lower than CLSE's 24.30% return.

CSM

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -1.53%
• YTD: 5.82%
• 6M: 4.63%
• 1Y: 22.54%
• 3Y*: 20.59%
• 5Y*: 12.48%
• 10Y*: 14.40%

CLSE

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 3.06%
• YTD: 24.30%
• 6M: 22.50%
• 1Y: 47.01%
• 3Y*: 31.13%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSM vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CSM Proshares Large Cap Core Plus	5.82%	21.84%	22.09%	23.50%	-12.34%
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF	24.30%	20.44%	35.54%	17.54%	-4.38%

Correlation

The correlation between CSM and CLSE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2022	0.67

The correlation between CSM and CLSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CSM vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSM

CSM Risk / Return Rank: 60
CSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
CSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
CSM Omega Ratio Rank: 58
CSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
CSM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

CLSE

CLSE Risk / Return Rank: 96
CLSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CLSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CLSE Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CLSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CLSE Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSM vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CSM	CLSE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	3.47	-1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	4.69	-2.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.60	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	9.74	-7.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.04	35.34	-25.29

CSM vs. CLSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the CLSE Sharpe Ratio of 3.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSM and CLSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CSM vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSM drawdown since its inception was -36.11%, which is greater than CLSE's maximum drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSM and CLSE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSM	CLSE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.11%	-16.45%	-19.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.40%	-4.85%	-4.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.30%	-16.45%	-1.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.72%	-1.39%	-2.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.03%	-3.56%	-0.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.25%	1.33%	+0.92%

Volatility

CSM vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) at 4.24%. This indicates that CSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSM	CLSE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.46%	4.24%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.55%	10.49%	-0.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.39%	13.62%	-1.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.19%	13.91%	+3.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.39%	13.91%	+4.48%

CSM vs. CLSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSE's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSM vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison

CSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than CLSE's 0.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF	0.77%	0.95%	0.93%	1.21%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CSM Proshares Large Cap Core Plus	1.03%	1.04%	1.06%	1.17%	1.37%	0.78%	1.21%	1.41%	1.54%	1.28%	1.49%	1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSM and CLSE in my portfolio?

CSM and CLSE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSM or CLSE?

CSM has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to CLSE (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSM dropped -36.11% vs CLSE's -16.45%.

Which ETF is better, CSM or CLSE?

On 3-year performance, CLSE leads with 31.13% vs 20.59% for CSM. On fees, CSM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CLSE has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CSM or CLSE?

Over the 3-year period, CLSE has performed better with a 31.13% return vs 20.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSM or CLSE?

CSM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CLSE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSM or CLSE?

CSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.77% for CLSE.

What is the main difference between CSM and CLSE?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Convergence Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CSM and 1.52% for CLSE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.47 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.