CSM vs. MGK
Compare and contrast key facts about Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK).
CSM and MGK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Credit Suisse 130/30 Large-Cap Index. It was launched on Jul 13, 2009. MGK is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Large Cap Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. Both CSM and MGK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CSM or MGK.
Correlation
The correlation between CSM and MGK is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CSM vs. MGK - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CSM:
0.57
MGK:
0.64
CSM:
0.93
MGK:
1.05
CSM:
1.14
MGK:
1.15
CSM:
0.62
MGK:
0.70
CSM:
2.50
MGK:
2.37
CSM:
4.52%
MGK:
6.91%
CSM:
19.90%
MGK:
25.53%
CSM:
-36.12%
MGK:
-48.36%
CSM:
-7.67%
MGK:
-10.46%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSM achieves a -3.50% return, which is significantly higher than MGK's -6.79% return. Over the past 10 years, CSM has underperformed MGK with an annualized return of 11.05%, while MGK has yielded a comparatively higher 15.28% annualized return.
CSM
-3.50%
11.01%
-2.78%
8.87%
15.41%
11.05%
MGK
-6.79%
15.09%
-1.58%
12.51%
17.42%
15.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSM vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than MGK's 0.07% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CSM vs. MGK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CSM
MGK
CSM vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CSM vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison
CSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than MGK's 0.47% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSM Proshares Large Cap Core Plus | 1.14% | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.37% | 0.78% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 1.54% | 1.28% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 1.39% |
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% | 1.25% |
Drawdowns
CSM vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSM drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum MGK drawdown of -48.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSM and MGK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CSM vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) is 11.72%, while Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a volatility of 14.39%. This indicates that CSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.