CSM vs. BDGS
Compare and contrast key facts about Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).
CSM and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Credit Suisse 130/30 Large-Cap Index. It was launched on Jul 13, 2009. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.
Performance
CSM vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSM vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CSM Proshares Large Cap Core Plus | -5.83% | 21.84% | 22.09% | 17.60% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | -1.41% | 10.61% | 19.07% | 8.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSM achieves a -5.83% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's -1.41% return.
CSM
- 1D
- 2.46%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- YTD
- -5.83%
- 6M
- -1.69%
- 1Y
- 18.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.84%
BDGS
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- -1.41%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 10.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSM vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSM vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank
CSM
BDGS
CSM vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSM | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 0.99 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.67 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.28 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.80 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 9.34 | -2.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSM | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 0.99 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 1.51 | -0.70 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSM and BDGS is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSM vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
CSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than BDGS's 0.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSM Proshares Large Cap Core Plus | 1.16% | 1.04% | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.37% | 0.78% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 1.54% | 1.28% | 1.49% | 1.67% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 0.56% | 0.55% | 1.81% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CSM vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSM drawdown since its inception was -36.11%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSM and BDGS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSM | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.11% | -9.12% | -26.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.92% | -5.85% | -7.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.17% | -2.15% | -5.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.07% | -0.67% | -3.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 1.13% | +1.69% |
Volatility
CSM vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 3.39%. This indicates that CSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSM | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | 3.39% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.49% | 5.09% | +4.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.97% | 10.70% | +8.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 8.35% | +8.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 8.35% | +10.02% |