CSL vs. OC
CSL (Carlisle Companies Incorporated) and OC (Owens Corning) are both stocks. Both operate in the Building Products & Equipment industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, CSL returned 14.57%/yr vs 11.32%/yr for OC. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CSL vs. OC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSL achieves a 8.12% return, which is significantly lower than OC's 10.06% return. Over the past 10 years, CSL has outperformed OC with an annualized return of 14.57%, while OC has yielded a comparatively lower 11.32% annualized return.
CSL
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 4.26%
- YTD
- 8.12%
- 6M
- 4.47%
- 1Y
- -2.49%
- 3Y*
- 14.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.87%
- 10Y*
- 14.57%
OC
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 6.45%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 6M
- 6.18%
- 1Y
- -7.46%
- 3Y*
- 1.71%
- 5Y*
- 5.91%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
CSL vs. OC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 8.12% | -12.26% | 19.14% | 34.26% | -4.08% | 60.64% | -1.96% | 63.10% | -10.31% | 4.51% |
OC Owens Corning | 10.06% | -33.02% | 16.61% | 77.17% | -4.23% | 20.93% | 18.12% | 50.63% | -51.68% | 80.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSL and OC is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2006 | 0.54 |
The correlation between CSL and OC shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.66 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CSL:
$17.08
OC:
-$8.56
CSL:
2.93
OC:
0.77
CSL:
$4.98B
OC:
$9.84B
CSL:
$1.41B
OC:
$2.65B
CSL:
$1.17B
OC:
$528.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSL vs. OC — Risk / Return Rank
CSL
OC
CSL vs. OC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) and Owens Corning (OC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSL | OC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.98 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | -0.28 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | -0.50 | +0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSL vs. OC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSL drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, smaller than the maximum OC drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSL and OC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSL | OC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.56% | -85.22% | +20.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.67% | -37.33% | +5.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.72% | -52.48% | +14.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.72% | -52.48% | +14.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.68% | -66.57% | +27.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.08% | -40.44% | +13.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.32% | -20.66% | +8.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.90% | 20.83% | -1.93% |
Volatility
CSL vs. OC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) is 10.87%, while Owens Corning (OC) has a volatility of 14.24%. This indicates that CSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSL | OC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.87% | 14.24% | -3.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.85% | 27.16% | -2.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.22% | 36.96% | -0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.81% | 34.67% | -3.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.68% | 35.34% | -5.66% |
Dividends
CSL vs. OC - Dividend Comparison
CSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than OC's 2.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 1.28% | 1.31% | 1.00% | 1.02% | 1.09% | 0.86% | 1.31% | 1.11% | 1.53% | 1.27% | 1.18% | 1.24% |
OC Owens Corning | 2.44% | 2.47% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 1.64% | 1.15% | 1.27% | 1.35% | 1.43% | 0.88% | 1.44% | 1.45% |
Financials
CSL vs. OC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carlisle Companies Incorporated and Owens Corning. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CSL vs. OC - Profitability Comparison
CSL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
OC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Owens Corning reported a gross profit of 510.00M and revenue of 2.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.5%.
CSL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported an operating income of 180.30M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.
OC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Owens Corning reported an operating income of 120.00M and revenue of 2.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.
CSL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a net income of 127.70M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
OC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Owens Corning reported a net income of -105.00M and revenue of 2.27B, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSL and OC have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OC has higher volatility (14.24%) compared to CSL (10.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSL dropped -64.56% vs OC's -85.22%.
CSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.14 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSL and OC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer