OC vs. SSD
OC (Owens Corning) and SSD (Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Building Products & Equipment industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, OC returned 11.71%/yr vs 17.75%/yr for SSD. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
OC vs. SSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OC achieves a 26.58% return, which is significantly higher than SSD's 16.85% return. Over the past 10 years, OC has underperformed SSD with an annualized return of 11.71%, while SSD has yielded a comparatively higher 17.75% annualized return.
OC
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -7.54%
- 6M
- 17.39%
- YTD
- 26.58%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- 1.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.51%
SSD
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -6.47%
- 6M
- 6.54%
- YTD
- 16.85%
- 1Y
- 5.49%
- 3Y*
- 6.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- 17.75%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.69%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $107.87M | $128.78M | $158.61M | |
| $62.45M | $58.74M | $62.47M |
OC vs. SSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OC Owens Corning | 26.58% | -33.02% | 16.61% | 77.17% | -4.23% | 20.93% | 18.12% | 50.63% | -51.68% | 80.33% |
SSD Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. | 16.85% | -1.95% | -15.74% | 125.36% | -35.62% | 50.20% | 17.51% | 50.84% | -4.39% | 33.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between OC and SSD is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2006 | 0.60 |
The correlation between OC and SSD shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
OC:
$11.19B
SSD:
$7.72B
OC:
-$9.77
SSD:
$9.14
OC:
0.77
SSD:
3.21
OC:
$9.84B
SSD:
$2.42B
OC:
$2.65B
SSD:
$1.11B
OC:
$528.00M
SSD:
$604.64M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OC vs. SSD — Risk / Return Rank
OC
SSD
OC vs. SSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Owens Corning (OC) and Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OC | SSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.05 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.06 | 0.26 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.10 | 0.47 | -0.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OC vs. SSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OC drawdown since its inception was -85.22%, which is greater than SSD's maximum drawdown of -68.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OC and SSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OC | SSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.22% | -68.16% | -17.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.33% | -20.38% | -16.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.48% | -34.40% | -18.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.48% | -44.50% | -7.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.57% | -44.50% | -22.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.50% | -11.16% | -20.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.73% | -16.33% | -4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.25% | 11.27% | +9.98% |
Volatility
OC vs. SSD - Volatility Comparison
Owens Corning (OC) and Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) have volatilities of 9.06% and 8.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OC | SSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.06% | 8.89% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.60% | 22.07% | +10.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.30% | 29.24% | +12.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.72% | 31.63% | +4.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.87% | 32.39% | +3.48% |
Dividends
OC vs. SSD - Dividend Comparison
OC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than SSD's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OC Owens Corning | 2.20% | 2.47% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 1.64% | 1.15% | 1.27% | 1.35% | 1.43% | 0.88% | 1.44% | 1.45% |
SSD Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. | 0.62% | 0.71% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 1.15% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 1.36% | 1.55% | 1.76% |
Financials
OC vs. SSD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Owens Corning and Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OC vs. SSD - Profitability Comparison
OC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Owens Corning reported a gross profit of 510.00M and revenue of 2.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.5%.
SSD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 318.19M and revenue of 671.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.4%.
OC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Owens Corning reported an operating income of 120.00M and revenue of 2.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.
SSD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 169.13M and revenue of 671.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.2%.
OC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Owens Corning reported a net income of -105.00M and revenue of 2.27B, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.
SSD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported a net income of 127.04M and revenue of 671.08M, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OC and SSD have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OC has higher volatility (9.06%) compared to SSD (8.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OC dropped -85.22% vs SSD's -68.16%.
SSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OC and SSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer