OC vs. CRH
OC (Owens Corning) and CRH (CRH plc) are both stocks. OC operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials), while CRH operates in Building Materials (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, OC returned 10.78%/yr vs 16.25%/yr for CRH. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OC vs. CRH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OC achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly higher than CRH's -14.04% return. Over the past 10 years, OC has underperformed CRH with an annualized return of 10.78%, while CRH has yielded a comparatively higher 16.25% annualized return.
OC
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- 9.13%
- 6M
- 8.56%
- 1Y
- -6.90%
- 3Y*
- 3.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.78%
CRH
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -7.40%
- YTD
- -14.04%
- 6M
- -9.55%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 32.04%
- 5Y*
- 18.45%
- 10Y*
- 16.25%
OC vs. CRH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OC Owens Corning | 9.13% | -33.02% | 16.61% | 77.17% | -4.23% | 20.93% | 18.12% | 50.63% | -51.68% | 80.33% |
CRH CRH plc | -14.04% | 36.87% | 35.93% | 81.33% | -20.51% | 27.09% | 8.78% | 57.05% | -26.48% | 7.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between OC and CRH is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2006 | 0.50 |
The correlation between OC and CRH shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
OC:
-$8.56
CRH:
$7.50
OC:
0.76
CRH:
1.88
OC:
$9.84B
CRH:
$38.22B
OC:
$2.65B
CRH:
$19.88B
OC:
$528.00M
CRH:
$10.87B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OC vs. CRH — Risk / Return Rank
OC
CRH
OC vs. CRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Owens Corning (OC) and CRH plc (CRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OC | CRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | 0.60 | -0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | 1.14 | -1.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.13 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 0.76 | -0.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | 1.97 | -2.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OC | CRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 | 0.60 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.60 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.53 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.46 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
OC vs. CRH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OC drawdown since its inception was -85.22%, which is greater than CRH's maximum drawdown of -65.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OC and CRH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OC | CRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.22% | -65.58% | -19.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.33% | -24.46% | -12.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.48% | -27.01% | -25.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.48% | -38.66% | -13.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.57% | -53.25% | -13.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.94% | -18.34% | -22.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.63% | -18.50% | -2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.45% | 9.39% | +11.06% |
Volatility
OC vs. CRH - Volatility Comparison
Owens Corning (OC) has a higher volatility of 13.13% compared to CRH plc (CRH) at 10.65%. This indicates that OC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OC | CRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.13% | 10.65% | +2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.08% | 24.72% | +1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.05% | 31.08% | +4.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.50% | 30.76% | +3.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.25% | 31.02% | +4.23% |
Dividends
OC vs. CRH - Dividend Comparison
OC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than CRH's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRH CRH plc | 1.43% | 1.19% | 1.51% | 3.41% | 5.59% | 2.21% | 2.16% | 2.02% | 0.87% | 2.02% | 2.06% | 2.39% |
OC Owens Corning | 2.46% | 2.47% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 1.64% | 1.15% | 1.27% | 1.35% | 1.43% | 0.88% | 1.44% | 1.45% |
Financials
OC vs. CRH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Owens Corning and CRH plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OC vs. CRH - Profitability Comparison
OC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Owens Corning reported a gross profit of 510.00M and revenue of 2.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.5%.
CRH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CRH plc reported a gross profit of 2.05B and revenue of 7.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.8%.
OC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Owens Corning reported an operating income of 120.00M and revenue of 2.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.
CRH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CRH plc reported an operating income of -38.00M and revenue of 7.37B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.
OC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Owens Corning reported a net income of -105.00M and revenue of 2.27B, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.
CRH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CRH plc reported a net income of -180.00M and revenue of 7.37B, resulting in a net margin of -2.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OC and CRH have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OC has higher volatility (13.13%) compared to CRH (10.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OC dropped -85.22% vs CRH's -65.58%.
CRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OC and CRH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer