PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OC vs. CRH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OC vs. CRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Owens Corning (OC) and CRH plc (CRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OC achieves a 12.49% return, which is significantly higher than CRH's -11.00% return. Over the past 10 years, OC has underperformed CRH with an annualized return of 11.23%, while CRH has yielded a comparatively higher 17.31% annualized return.


OC

1D
-0.40%
1M
5.71%
YTD
12.49%
6M
10.87%
1Y
-6.08%
3Y*
1.90%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*
11.23%

CRH

1D
-0.87%
1M
9.87%
YTD
-11.00%
6M
-12.27%
1Y
24.35%
3Y*
29.82%
5Y*
19.61%
10Y*
17.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OC vs. CRH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OC
Owens Corning
12.49%-33.02%16.61%77.17%-4.23%20.93%18.12%50.63%-51.68%80.33%
CRH
CRH plc
-11.00%36.87%35.93%81.33%-20.51%27.09%8.78%57.05%-26.48%7.19%

Correlation

The correlation between OC and CRH is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2006

0.50

The correlation between OC and CRH shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

OC:

-$8.56

CRH:

$7.50

PS Ratio

OC:

0.79

CRH:

1.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

OC:

$9.84B

CRH:

$38.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OC:

$2.65B

CRH:

$19.88B

EBITDA (TTM)

OC:

$528.00M

CRH:

$10.87B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OC vs. CRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OC
OC Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
OC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
OC Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
OC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
OC Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

CRH
CRH Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRH Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRH Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OC vs. CRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Owens Corning (OC) and CRH plc (CRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OCCRHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.15

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

1.00

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.29

2.37

-2.66

OC vs. CRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OC Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the CRH Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OC and CRH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OC vs. CRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OC drawdown since its inception was -85.22%, which is greater than CRH's maximum drawdown of -65.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OC and CRH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OCCRHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.22%

-65.58%

-19.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.33%

-24.46%

-12.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.48%

-27.01%

-25.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.48%

-38.66%

-13.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.57%

-53.25%

-13.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.13%

-15.46%

-23.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.68%

-18.50%

-2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.03%

10.30%

+10.73%

Volatility

OC vs. CRH - Volatility Comparison

Owens Corning (OC) has a higher volatility of 12.78% compared to CRH plc (CRH) at 10.75%. This indicates that OC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OCCRHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.78%

10.75%

+2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.96%

25.05%

+2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.34%

32.09%

+5.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.78%

30.95%

+3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.41%

30.92%

+4.49%

Dividends

OC vs. CRH - Dividend Comparison

OC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than CRH's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRH
CRH plc
1.38%1.19%1.51%3.41%5.59%2.21%2.16%2.02%0.87%2.02%2.06%2.39%
OC
Owens Corning
2.38%2.47%1.41%1.40%1.64%1.15%1.27%1.35%1.43%0.88%1.44%1.45%

Financials

OC vs. CRH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Owens Corning and CRH plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
2.27B
7.37B
(OC) Total Revenue
(CRH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

OC vs. CRH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Owens Corning and CRH plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
22.5%
27.8%
Portfolio components
OC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Owens Corning reported a gross profit of 510.00M and revenue of 2.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.5%.

CRH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CRH plc reported a gross profit of 2.05B and revenue of 7.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.8%.

OC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Owens Corning reported an operating income of 120.00M and revenue of 2.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

CRH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CRH plc reported an operating income of -38.00M and revenue of 7.37B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.

OC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Owens Corning reported a net income of -105.00M and revenue of 2.27B, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.

CRH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CRH plc reported a net income of -180.00M and revenue of 7.37B, resulting in a net margin of -2.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OC and CRH have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OC has higher volatility (12.78%) compared to CRH (10.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OC dropped -85.22% vs CRH's -65.58%.

CRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OC and CRH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer