PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSGP vs. ISRG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CSGP vs. ISRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSGP achieves a -51.16% return, which is significantly lower than ISRG's -27.42% return. Over the past 10 years, CSGP has underperformed ISRG with an annualized return of 4.54%, while ISRG has yielded a comparatively higher 19.09% annualized return.


CSGP

1D
0.58%
1M
3.11%
YTD
-51.16%
6M
-51.87%
1Y
-59.54%
3Y*
-26.28%
5Y*
-17.70%
10Y*
4.54%

ISRG

1D
-0.45%
1M
-3.97%
YTD
-27.42%
6M
-24.20%
1Y
-19.74%
3Y*
9.23%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*
19.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSGP vs. ISRG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSGP
CoStar Group, Inc.
-51.16%-6.08%-18.08%13.08%-2.21%-14.50%54.48%77.36%13.60%57.54%
ISRG
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
-27.42%8.51%54.72%27.14%-26.15%31.76%38.39%23.43%31.23%72.64%

Correlation

The correlation between CSGP and ISRG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2000

0.35

The correlation between CSGP and ISRG shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.47 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CSGP:

$13.60B

ISRG:

$147.90B

EPS

CSGP:

$0.06

ISRG:

$8.24

PE Ratio

CSGP:

544.46

ISRG:

49.88

PS Ratio

CSGP:

4.04

ISRG:

14.04

PB Ratio

CSGP:

1.72

ISRG:

8.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

CSGP:

$3.41B

ISRG:

$10.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CSGP:

$2.64B

ISRG:

$7.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

CSGP:

$284.20M

ISRG:

$3.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSGP vs. ISRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSGP
CSGP Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CSGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSGP Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
CSGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSGP Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

ISRG
ISRG Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ISRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISRG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
ISRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISRG Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSGP vs. ISRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSGPISRGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.66

0.90

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

-0.62

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.52

-1.24

-0.28

CSGP vs. ISRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSGP Sharpe Ratio is -1.56, which is lower than the ISRG Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSGP and ISRG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSGP vs. ISRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSGP drawdown since its inception was -71.11%, smaller than the maximum ISRG drawdown of -82.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSGP and ISRG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSGPISRGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.11%

-82.26%

+11.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.11%

-32.14%

-34.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.41%

-34.10%

-33.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.07%

-49.90%

-18.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.07%

-49.90%

-18.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.07%

-32.66%

-34.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.29%

-21.28%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.50%

16.00%

+23.50%

Volatility

CSGP vs. ISRG - Volatility Comparison

CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) have volatilities of 9.56% and 9.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSGPISRGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.56%

9.70%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.06%

20.72%

+13.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.69%

30.69%

+8.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.68%

33.19%

+1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.63%

32.40%

+0.23%

Dividends

CSGP vs. ISRG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSGP nor ISRG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CSGP vs. ISRG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoStar Group, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
897.00M
2.77B
(CSGP) Total Revenue
(ISRG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CSGP vs. ISRG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CoStar Group, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
78.2%
66.1%
Portfolio components
CSGP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoStar Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 701.00M and revenue of 897.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.2%.

ISRG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.83B and revenue of 2.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.1%.

CSGP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoStar Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.00M and revenue of 897.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

ISRG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. reported an operating income of 855.30M and revenue of 2.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.

CSGP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoStar Group, Inc. reported a net income of 3.00M and revenue of 897.00M, resulting in a net margin of 0.3%.

ISRG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. reported a net income of 821.50M and revenue of 2.77B, resulting in a net margin of 29.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CSGP and ISRG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISRG has higher volatility (9.70%) compared to CSGP (9.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSGP dropped -71.11% vs ISRG's -82.26%.

ISRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.65 vs -1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSGP and ISRG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer