PortfoliosLab logo
CSGP vs. TMO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CSGP and TMO is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CSGP vs. TMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CSGP:

-0.24

TMO:

-1.05

Sortino Ratio

CSGP:

-0.42

TMO:

-1.67

Omega Ratio

CSGP:

0.95

TMO:

0.80

Calmar Ratio

CSGP:

-0.45

TMO:

-0.76

Martin Ratio

CSGP:

-1.49

TMO:

-1.91

Ulcer Index

CSGP:

9.25%

TMO:

16.04%

Daily Std Dev

CSGP:

31.67%

TMO:

27.28%

Max Drawdown

CSGP:

-71.10%

TMO:

-71.16%

Current Drawdown

CSGP:

-25.74%

TMO:

-38.98%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CSGP:

$31.48B

TMO:

$152.34B

EPS

CSGP:

$0.28

TMO:

$17.01

PE Ratio

CSGP:

265.14

TMO:

23.64

PEG Ratio

CSGP:

2.74

TMO:

1.55

PS Ratio

CSGP:

11.19

TMO:

3.55

PB Ratio

CSGP:

3.68

TMO:

3.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

CSGP:

$2.81B

TMO:

$42.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CSGP:

$2.23B

TMO:

$17.83B

EBITDA (TTM)

CSGP:

$165.70M

TMO:

$10.60B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSGP achieves a 3.46% return, which is significantly higher than TMO's -22.32% return. Over the past 10 years, CSGP has outperformed TMO with an annualized return of 13.62%, while TMO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.38% annualized return.


CSGP

YTD

3.46%

1M

-10.44%

6M

-9.64%

1Y

-7.56%

3Y*

6.40%

5Y*

2.43%

10Y*

13.62%

TMO

YTD

-22.32%

1M

-5.56%

6M

-22.48%

1Y

-28.62%

3Y*

-10.75%

5Y*

3.20%

10Y*

12.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CoStar Group, Inc.

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CSGP vs. TMO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSGP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CSGP is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CSGP is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CSGP is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CSGP is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CSGP is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CSGP is 66
Martin Ratio Rank

TMO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TMO is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TMO is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TMO is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TMO is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TMO is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TMO is 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CSGP vs. TMO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CSGP Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is higher than the TMO Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSGP and TMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CSGP vs. TMO - Dividend Comparison

CSGP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CSGP
CoStar Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMO
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
0.40%0.30%0.26%0.22%0.16%0.19%0.23%0.30%0.32%0.43%0.42%0.48%

Drawdowns

CSGP vs. TMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSGP drawdown since its inception was -71.10%, roughly equal to the maximum TMO drawdown of -71.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSGP and TMO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CSGP vs. TMO - Volatility Comparison

CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) has a higher volatility of 12.88% compared to Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO) at 11.67%. This indicates that CSGP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CSGP vs. TMO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoStar Group, Inc. and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20212022202320242025
732.20M
10.36B
(CSGP) Total Revenue
(TMO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CSGP vs. TMO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CoStar Group, Inc. and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
79.1%
40.9%
(CSGP) Gross Margin
(TMO) Gross Margin
CSGP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CoStar Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 578.90M and revenue of 732.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.1%.

TMO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.24B and revenue of 10.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.9%.

CSGP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CoStar Group, Inc. reported an operating income of -42.80M and revenue of 732.20M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.9%.

TMO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. reported an operating income of 1.72B and revenue of 10.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.

CSGP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CoStar Group, Inc. reported a net income of -14.80M and revenue of 732.20M, resulting in a net margin of -2.0%.

TMO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. reported a net income of 1.51B and revenue of 10.36B, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.