CSGP vs. QQQ

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CSGP (CoStar Group, Inc.) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, CSGP returned 3.45%/yr vs 20.44%/yr for QQQ. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

CSGP vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSGP achieves a -57.23% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 12.26% return. Over the past 10 years, CSGP has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 3.45%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 20.44% annualized return.

CSGP

• 1D: -2.38%
• 1M: -4.13%
• 6M: -53.24%
• YTD: -57.23%
• 1Y: -69.60%
• 3Y*: -29.80%
• 5Y*: -20.20%
• 10Y*: 3.45%
• ALL TIME*: 13.13%

QQQ

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -3.45%
• 6M: 10.89%
• YTD: 12.26%
• 1Y: 24.81%
• 3Y*: 22.29%
• 5Y*: 14.23%
• 10Y*: 20.44%
• ALL TIME*: 10.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CSGP CoStar Group, Inc.	$258.97M	$228.48M	$248.71M
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	$30.32B	$28.40B	$31.45B

CSGP vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CSGP CoStar Group, Inc.	-57.23%	-6.08%	-18.08%	13.08%	-2.21%	-14.50%	54.48%	77.36%	13.60%	57.54%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	12.26%	20.77%	25.58%	54.86%	-32.58%	27.42%	48.62%	38.96%	-0.13%	32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between CSGP and QQQ is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999	0.48

The correlation between CSGP and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.49 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CSGP vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CSGP

CSGP Risk / Return Rank: 2
CSGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
CSGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
CSGP Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CSGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CSGP Martin Ratio Rank: 6

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 49
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 45
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CSGP vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CSGP	QQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.68	1.16	-2.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-3.13	1.65	-4.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.62	1.21	-0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.97	1.88	-2.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.49	6.00	-7.49

CSGP vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSGP Sharpe Ratio is -1.68, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSGP and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CSGP vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSGP drawdown since its inception was -72.79%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSGP and QQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSGP	QQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.79%	-82.97%	+10.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-71.97%	-11.96%	-60.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-72.23%	-22.77%	-49.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-72.79%	-35.12%	-37.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.79%	-35.12%	-37.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.17%	-7.69%	-63.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.51%	-32.62%	+10.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.86%	3.74%	+43.12%

Volatility

CSGP vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) has a higher volatility of 14.74% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.87%. This indicates that CSGP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSGP	QQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.74%	6.87%	+7.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.38%	16.08%	+19.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.59%	19.38%	+22.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.45%	22.90%	+12.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.96%	22.50%	+10.46%

Dividends

CSGP vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

CSGP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSGP CoStar Group, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.44%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSGP and QQQ in my portfolio?

CSGP and QQQ have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSGP or QQQ?

CSGP has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to QQQ (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSGP dropped -72.79% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.