PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSD vs. SRHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSD vs. SRHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSD achieves a 40.17% return, which is significantly higher than SRHQ's 12.99% return.


CSD

1D
0.36%
1M
5.52%
YTD
40.17%
6M
38.88%
1Y
73.14%
3Y*
37.02%
5Y*
16.53%
10Y*
14.06%

SRHQ

1D
1.13%
1M
2.01%
YTD
12.99%
6M
14.13%
1Y
23.59%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSD vs. SRHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
40.17%21.58%27.61%23.77%3.66%
SRHQ
SRH U.S. Quality ETF
12.99%7.34%16.49%21.81%4.20%

Correlation

The correlation between CSD and SRHQ is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2022

0.82

The correlation between CSD and SRHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSD vs. SRHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSD
SRHQ

Industrials

31.1%
22.5%

Technology

18.6%
22.1%

Healthcare

13.1%
20.4%

Basic Materials

11.1%
1.3%

Communication Services

9.0%
2.5%

Utilities

7.0%
1.3%

Real Estate

5.1%
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%
12.7%

Financial Services

0.1%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.7%

Energy

-

1.2%

Industrials

CSD
31.1%
SRHQ
22.5%

Technology

CSD
18.6%
SRHQ
22.1%

Healthcare

CSD
13.1%
SRHQ
20.4%

Basic Materials

CSD
11.1%
SRHQ
1.3%

Communication Services

CSD
9.0%
SRHQ
2.5%

Utilities

CSD
7.0%
SRHQ
1.3%

Real Estate

CSD
5.1%
SRHQ
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

CSD
2.9%
SRHQ
12.7%

Financial Services

CSD
0.1%
SRHQ
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

CSD

-

SRHQ
5.7%

Energy

CSD

-

SRHQ
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSD vs. SRHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSD
CSD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSD Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SRHQ
SRHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SRHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SRHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSD vs. SRHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSDSRHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.28

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.48

3.76

+2.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.42

12.86

+12.56

CSD vs. SRHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSD Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the SRHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSD and SRHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSDSRHQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09

1.61

+1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

1.09

-0.65

Drawdowns

CSD vs. SRHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSD drawdown since its inception was -70.47%, which is greater than SRHQ's maximum drawdown of -18.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSD and SRHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSDSRHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.47%

-18.50%

-51.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.34%

-6.31%

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.15%

-18.50%

-11.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.61%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.23%

-3.08%

-11.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

1.84%

+1.05%

Volatility

CSD vs. SRHQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ) at 3.53%. This indicates that CSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSDSRHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

3.53%

+2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.29%

10.76%

+7.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.82%

14.73%

+9.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.26%

16.03%

+7.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.83%

16.03%

+8.80%

CSD vs. SRHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SRHQ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSD vs. SRHQ - Dividend Comparison

CSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than SRHQ's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
0.11%0.16%0.17%0.51%0.86%0.73%0.99%1.08%0.99%0.60%1.62%2.61%
SRHQ
SRH U.S. Quality ETF
0.70%0.76%0.66%0.84%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSD and SRHQ have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSD has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to SRHQ (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSD dropped -70.47% vs SRHQ's -18.50%.

On 3-year performance, CSD leads with 37.02% vs 17.84% for SRHQ. On fees, SRHQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SRHQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CSD has performed better with a 37.02% return vs 17.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SRHQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSD.

SRHQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.11% for CSD.

CSD tracks S&P U.S. Spin-Off Index, while SRHQ tracks SRH US Quality Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and SRH. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CSD and 0.35% for SRHQ.

CSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSD and SRHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer