PortfoliosLab logo
SRHQ vs. FACGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SRHQ and FACGX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

SRHQ vs. FACGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ) and Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C (FACGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SRHQ:

0.54

FACGX:

0.58

Sortino Ratio

SRHQ:

0.86

FACGX:

0.86

Omega Ratio

SRHQ:

1.11

FACGX:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

SRHQ:

0.52

FACGX:

0.52

Martin Ratio

SRHQ:

1.70

FACGX:

1.60

Ulcer Index

SRHQ:

5.63%

FACGX:

8.70%

Daily Std Dev

SRHQ:

18.67%

FACGX:

28.27%

Max Drawdown

SRHQ:

-18.50%

FACGX:

-65.51%

Current Drawdown

SRHQ:

-7.77%

FACGX:

-7.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRHQ achieves a -2.45% return, which is significantly lower than FACGX's -0.56% return.


SRHQ

YTD

-2.45%

1M

3.06%

6M

-7.37%

1Y

8.78%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FACGX

YTD

-0.56%

1M

9.32%

6M

-0.66%

1Y

16.90%

3Y*

19.07%

5Y*

14.96%

10Y*

16.69%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SRH U.S. Quality ETF

SRHQ vs. FACGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRHQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FACGX's 1.80% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SRHQ vs. FACGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRHQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SRHQ is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SRHQ is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SRHQ is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SRHQ is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SRHQ is 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SRHQ is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

FACGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FACGX is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FACGX is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FACGX is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FACGX is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FACGX is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FACGX is 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SRHQ vs. FACGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ) and Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C (FACGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SRHQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is comparable to the FACGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRHQ and FACGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

SRHQ vs. FACGX - Dividend Comparison

SRHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, while FACGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SRHQ
SRH U.S. Quality ETF
0.69%0.66%0.84%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FACGX
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%11.75%6.13%4.87%14.01%8.00%17.39%12.23%

Drawdowns

SRHQ vs. FACGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRHQ drawdown since its inception was -18.50%, smaller than the maximum FACGX drawdown of -65.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRHQ and FACGX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

SRHQ vs. FACGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ) is 4.71%, while Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C (FACGX) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that SRHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FACGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...