CSD vs. IDMO
CSD (Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF) and IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSD is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P U.S. Spin-Off Index, while IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSD returned 13.46%/yr vs 12.47%/yr for IDMO. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSD charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IDMO.
Performance
CSD vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSD achieves a 37.16% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 8.27% return. Over the past 10 years, CSD has outperformed IDMO with an annualized return of 13.46%, while IDMO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.47% annualized return.
CSD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- 6M
- 22.61%
- YTD
- 37.16%
- 1Y
- 63.64%
- 3Y*
- 33.26%
- 5Y*
- 17.75%
- 10Y*
- 13.46%
IDMO
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 21.68%
- 3Y*
- 24.84%
- 5Y*
- 15.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.47%
CSD vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSD Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF | 37.16% | 21.58% | 27.61% | 23.77% | -15.04% | 13.01% | 10.79% | 20.61% | -17.82% | 20.64% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 8.27% | 42.17% | 12.79% | 20.16% | -12.03% | 14.31% | 22.01% | 26.09% | -16.66% | 29.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSD and IDMO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012 | 0.48 |
The correlation between CSD and IDMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CSD vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CSD
IDMO
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Industrials
CSD
IDMO
Technology
CSD
IDMO
Healthcare
CSD
IDMO
Utilities
CSD
IDMO
Basic Materials
CSD
IDMO
Communication Services
CSD
IDMO
Consumer Cyclical
CSD
IDMO
Real Estate
CSD
IDMO
Financial Services
CSD
IDMO
Consumer Defensive
CSD
-
IDMO
Energy
CSD
-
IDMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSD vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank
CSD
IDMO
CSD vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSD | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.22 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.64 | 1.77 | +3.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.50 | 6.94 | +12.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSD vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSD drawdown since its inception was -70.47%, which is greater than IDMO's maximum drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSD and IDMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSD | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.47% | -39.38% | -31.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.34% | -12.31% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.15% | -12.65% | -17.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.15% | -27.07% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.55% | -31.34% | -26.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.65% | -3.93% | -4.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.17% | -9.70% | -4.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 3.13% | +0.14% |
Volatility
CSD vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) has a higher volatility of 8.99% compared to Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) at 5.93%. This indicates that CSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSD | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.99% | 5.93% | +3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.59% | 16.86% | +2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.71% | 18.53% | +7.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.61% | 18.14% | +5.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.96% | 17.89% | +7.07% |
CSD vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSD vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison
CSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than IDMO's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSD Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF | 0.12% | 0.16% | 0.17% | 0.51% | 0.86% | 0.73% | 0.99% | 1.08% | 0.99% | 0.60% | 1.62% | 2.61% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 3.69% | 3.71% | 2.24% | 2.89% | 3.66% | 1.81% | 1.63% | 2.78% | 3.27% | 3.08% | 2.18% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSD and IDMO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSD has higher volatility (8.99%) compared to IDMO (5.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSD dropped -70.47% vs IDMO's -39.38%.
On 10-year performance, CSD leads with 13.46% vs 12.47% for IDMO. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IDMO has been the lower-risk option at 5.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CSD has performed better with a 13.46% return vs 12.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSD.
IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 0.12% for CSD.
CSD is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while IDMO is Momentum. CSD tracks S&P U.S. Spin-Off Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CSD and 0.25% for IDMO.
CSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSD and IDMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer