CSD vs. FLDZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CSD (Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF) and FLDZ (RiverNorth Patriot ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. CSD is passively managed, while FLDZ is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CSD returned 36.42%/yr vs 13.19%/yr for FLDZ. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSD charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for FLDZ.

Performance

CSD vs. FLDZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSD achieves a 39.67% return, which is significantly higher than FLDZ's 4.32% return.

CSD

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 8.22%
• YTD: 39.67%
• 6M: 39.98%
• 1Y: 71.88%
• 3Y*: 36.42%
• 5Y*: 16.45%
• 10Y*: 14.07%

FLDZ

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -0.80%
• YTD: 4.32%
• 6M: 3.13%
• 1Y: 8.06%
• 3Y*: 13.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSD vs. FLDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CSD Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF	39.67%	21.58%	27.61%	23.77%	-15.13%
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	4.32%	6.66%	15.99%	12.15%	-11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CSD and FLDZ is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2022	0.86

The correlation between CSD and FLDZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CSD vs. FLDZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CSD	FLDZ
Industrials	31.1%	12.1%
Technology	18.6%	3.4%
Healthcare	13.1%	11.7%
Basic Materials	11.1%	1.6%
Communication Services	9.0%	4.6%
Utilities	7.0%	11.9%
Real Estate	5.1%	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	14.8%
Financial Services	0.1%	15.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.8%
Energy	-	11.5%

Return for Risk

CSD vs. FLDZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSD

CSD Risk / Return Rank: 88
CSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
CSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CSD Omega Ratio Rank: 81
CSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CSD Martin Ratio Rank: 93

FLDZ

FLDZ Risk / Return Rank: 24
FLDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
FLDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
FLDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 20
FLDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FLDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSD vs. FLDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSD	FLDZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.03	0.72	+2.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.80	1.10	+2.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.13	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.37	1.30	+5.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.98	3.94	+21.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSD vs. FLDZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSD Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is higher than the FLDZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSD and FLDZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSD	FLDZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.03	0.72	+2.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.34	+0.10

Drawdowns

CSD vs. FLDZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSD drawdown since its inception was -70.47%, which is greater than FLDZ's maximum drawdown of -19.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSD and FLDZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSD	FLDZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.47%	-19.54%	-50.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.34%	-6.25%	-5.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.15%	-17.43%	-12.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.72%	+1.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.23%	-5.98%	-8.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	2.05%	+0.84%

Volatility

CSD vs. FLDZ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ) at 2.57%. This indicates that CSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSD	FLDZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.19%	2.57%	+3.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.29%	7.63%	+10.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.87%	11.31%	+12.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.26%	16.91%	+6.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.83%	16.91%	+7.92%

CSD vs. FLDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDZ's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSD vs. FLDZ - Dividend Comparison

CSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than FLDZ's 1.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSD Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF	0.11%	0.16%	0.17%	0.51%	0.86%	0.73%	0.99%	1.08%	0.99%	0.60%	1.62%	2.61%
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	1.48%	1.54%	1.17%	1.39%	1.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSD and FLDZ in my portfolio?

CSD and FLDZ have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSD or FLDZ?

CSD has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to FLDZ (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSD dropped -70.47% vs FLDZ's -19.54%.

Which ETF is better, CSD or FLDZ?

On 3-year performance, CSD leads with 36.42% vs 13.19% for FLDZ. On fees, CSD is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FLDZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CSD or FLDZ?

Over the 3-year period, CSD has performed better with a 36.42% return vs 13.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSD or FLDZ?

CSD is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for FLDZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSD or FLDZ?

FLDZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.11% for CSD.

What is the main difference between CSD and FLDZ?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and RiverNorth. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CSD and 0.77% for FLDZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.