PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLDZ vs. IWS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLDZ vs. IWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLDZ vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FLDZ
RiverNorth Patriot ETF
0.04%6.66%15.99%12.15%-11.99%
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
3.65%10.82%12.91%12.52%-12.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLDZ achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than IWS's 3.65% return.


FLDZ

1D
1.65%
1M
-4.25%
YTD
0.04%
6M
-1.20%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
11.59%
5Y*
10Y*

IWS

1D
2.43%
1M
-5.01%
YTD
3.65%
6M
5.15%
1Y
17.51%
3Y*
12.94%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLDZ vs. IWS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLDZ has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than IWS's 0.23% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLDZ vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLDZ
FLDZ Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FLDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLDZ vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLDZIWSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.40

0.96

-0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.67

1.44

-0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.20

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

1.37

-0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.79

6.34

-3.55

FLDZ vs. IWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLDZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the IWS Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLDZ and IWS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLDZIWSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

0.96

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.40

-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between FLDZ and IWS is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FLDZ vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison

FLDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than IWS's 1.48% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLDZ
RiverNorth Patriot ETF
1.54%1.54%1.17%1.39%1.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.48%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%

Drawdowns

FLDZ vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLDZ drawdown since its inception was -19.54%, smaller than the maximum IWS drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDZ and IWS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLDZIWSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.54%

-62.40%

+42.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.76%

-13.33%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.70%

-5.29%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-8.07%

+1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

2.89%

-0.19%

Volatility

FLDZ vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ) is 3.99%, while iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that FLDZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLDZIWSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

5.38%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.77%

10.14%

-1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.10%

18.29%

-2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.14%

17.33%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

19.35%

-2.21%