CSCS vs. CRSH
CSCS (Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares) and CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSCS is a Inverse Equities fund managed by Direxion, while CRSH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Over the past year, CSCS returned -46.14% vs -7.68% for CRSH. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSCS charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CRSH.
Performance
CSCS vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSCS achieves a -39.33% return, which is significantly lower than CRSH's 12.45% return.
CSCS
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- -39.33%
- 6M
- -38.37%
- 1Y
- -46.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRSH
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 9.65%
- YTD
- 12.45%
- 6M
- 19.65%
- 1Y
- -7.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSCS vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSCS Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares | -39.33% | -11.22% |
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 12.45% | -17.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSCS and CRSH is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSCS vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank
CSCS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRSH
CSCS vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares (CSCS) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSCS | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.99 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSCS vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSCS drawdown since its inception was -51.58%, smaller than the maximum CRSH drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCS and CRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSCS | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.58% | -63.68% | +12.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.58% | -33.45% | -18.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.68% | -55.76% | +8.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.57% | -43.42% | +27.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 21.71% | — |
Volatility
CSCS vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSCS | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.11% | 35.54% | -4.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.11% | 47.24% | -16.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.11% | 47.24% | -16.13% |
CSCS vs. CRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSCS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CRSH's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSCS vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison
CSCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, less than CRSH's 82.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 82.03% | 138.78% | 94.25% |
CSCS Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares | 4.70% | 1.72% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSCS and CRSH have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, CRSH leads with -7.68% vs -46.14% for CSCS. On fees, CRSH is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CRSH has performed better with a -7.68% return vs -46.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRSH is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for CSCS.
CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 82.03%, compared with 4.70% for CSCS.
CSCS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while CRSH is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for CSCS and 0.99% for CRSH.
Find the right allocation for CSCS and CRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer