PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSCS vs. SPUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSCS vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares (CSCS) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSCS achieves a -36.67% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 16.68% return.


CSCS

1D
-1.90%
1M
8.19%
6M
-38.33%
YTD
-36.67%
1Y
-43.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPUU

1D
-0.66%
1M
1.54%
6M
14.03%
YTD
16.68%
1Y
38.10%
3Y*
34.68%
5Y*
18.01%
10Y*
24.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSCS vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CSCS
Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares
-36.67%-11.22%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
16.68%23.34%

Correlation

The correlation between CSCS and SPUU is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

-0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSCS vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSCS
CSCS Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
CSCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSCS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
CSCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSCS Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSCS vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares (CSCS) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSCSSPUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.74

1.27

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

2.10

-2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.91

8.74

-10.65

CSCS vs. SPUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSCS Sharpe Ratio is -1.36, which is lower than the SPUU Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSCS and SPUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSCS vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSCS drawdown since its inception was -51.58%, smaller than the maximum SPUU drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCS and SPUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSCSSPUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.58%

-59.35%

+7.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.58%

-18.19%

-33.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.39%

-3.86%

-41.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.61%

-9.47%

-7.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.69%

4.37%

+18.32%

Volatility

CSCS vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares (CSCS) has a higher volatility of 9.50% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) at 8.51%. This indicates that CSCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSCSSPUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.50%

8.51%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.50%

20.05%

+8.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.85%

25.18%

+6.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.46%

33.69%

-2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.46%

35.75%

-4.29%

CSCS vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSCS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSCS vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison

CSCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than SPUU's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSCS
Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares
4.51%1.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
1.35%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSCS and SPUU have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSCS has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to SPUU (8.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSCS dropped -51.58% vs SPUU's -59.35%.

On 1-year performance, SPUU leads with 38.10% vs -43.25% for CSCS. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 8.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 38.10% return vs -43.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for CSCS.

CSCS has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 1.35% for SPUU.

CSCS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SPUU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for CSCS and 0.60% for SPUU.

SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSCS and SPUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer