CSCS vs. MSTZ
CSCS (Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSCS charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
CSCS vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSCS achieves a -42.32% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -46.88% return.
CSCS
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -28.69%
- YTD
- -42.32%
- 6M
- -41.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTZ
- 1D
- 14.02%
- 1M
- 86.49%
- YTD
- -46.88%
- 6M
- -23.06%
- 1Y
- 94.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSCS vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSCS Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares | -42.32% | -11.22% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -46.88% | 275.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSCS and MSTZ is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSCS vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
CSCS
MSTZ
CSCS vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares (CSCS) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSCS | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.67 | -0.53 | -1.14 |
Drawdowns
CSCS vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSCS drawdown since its inception was -50.80%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCS and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSCS | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.80% | -99.36% | +48.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -84.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.26% | -98.14% | +47.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.70% | -94.39% | +80.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 40.30% | — |
Volatility
CSCS vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSCS | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 37.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 125.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.62% | 140.34% | -109.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.62% | 170.37% | -139.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.62% | 170.37% | -139.75% |
CSCS vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSCS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSCS vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
CSCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CSCS Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares | 4.02% | 1.72% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSCS and MSTZ have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSCS is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSCS is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.
CSCS has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for CSCS and 1.05% for MSTZ.
Find the right allocation for CSCS and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer