PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSCS vs. MSTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSCS vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares (CSCS) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSCS achieves a -42.32% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -46.88% return.


CSCS

1D
1.10%
1M
-28.69%
YTD
-42.32%
6M
-41.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTZ

1D
14.02%
1M
86.49%
YTD
-46.88%
6M
-23.06%
1Y
94.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSCS vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CSCS
Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares
-42.32%-11.22%
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
-46.88%275.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CSCS and MSTZ is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSCS vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSCS

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSCS vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares (CSCS) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CSCS vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSCSMSTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.67

-0.53

-1.14

Drawdowns

CSCS vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSCS drawdown since its inception was -50.80%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCS and MSTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSCSMSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.80%

-99.36%

+48.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.26%

-98.14%

+47.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.70%

-94.39%

+80.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.30%

Volatility

CSCS vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSCSMSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

125.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.62%

140.34%

-109.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.62%

170.37%

-139.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.62%

170.37%

-139.75%

CSCS vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSCS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSCS vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

CSCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CSCS and MSTZ have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSCS is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSCS is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

CSCS has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for CSCS and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSCS and MSTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer