CSB vs. QQQS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CSB (VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) and QQQS (Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - CSB tracks the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index while QQQS tracks the Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CSB returned 11.48%/yr vs 15.89%/yr for QQQS. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QQQS.

Performance

CSB vs. QQQS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSB achieves a 8.30% return, which is significantly lower than QQQS's 27.27% return.

CSB

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: -1.58%
• YTD: 8.30%
• 6M: 7.74%
• 1Y: 17.95%
• 3Y*: 11.48%
• 5Y*: 3.65%
• 10Y*: 9.58%

QQQS

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: 5.91%
• YTD: 27.27%
• 6M: 27.40%
• 1Y: 79.99%
• 3Y*: 15.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSB vs. QQQS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF	8.30%	2.26%	9.64%	12.60%	6.85%
QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF	27.27%	23.03%	10.20%	-1.94%	6.56%

Correlation

The correlation between CSB and QQQS is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2022	0.70

The correlation between CSB and QQQS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSB vs. QQQS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CSB	QQQS
Financial Services	26.5%	0.0%
Utilities	22.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	19.0%	5.2%
Energy	11.5%	2.2%
Industrials	8.5%	4.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	1.4%
Communication Services	3.6%	2.4%
Basic Materials	3.4%	1.0%
Technology	1.2%	42.1%
Healthcare	0.4%	41.0%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

CSB vs. QQQS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSB

CSB Risk / Return Rank: 40
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 33
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 44

QQQS

QQQS Risk / Return Rank: 85
QQQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
QQQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
QQQS Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QQQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
QQQS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSB vs. QQQS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSB	QQQS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	3.00	-1.76
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	3.78	-1.87
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.44	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	5.90	-3.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.26	19.70	-12.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSB vs. QQQS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the QQQS Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSB and QQQS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSB	QQQS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	3.00	-1.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.63	-0.18

Drawdowns

CSB vs. QQQS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSB drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, which is greater than QQQS's maximum drawdown of -38.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSB and QQQS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSB	QQQS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.07%	-38.06%	-4.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.18%	-13.63%	+6.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.82%	-34.32%	+12.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.12%	-2.55%	-0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.14%	-13.26%	+6.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.48%	4.07%	-1.59%

Volatility

CSB vs. QQQS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) is 3.59%, while Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that CSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSB	QQQS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.59%	7.39%	-3.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.19%	18.49%	-9.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.54%	26.90%	-12.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.78%	28.34%	-9.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.31%	28.34%	-7.03%

CSB vs. QQQS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQS's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSB vs. QQQS - Dividend Comparison

CSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than QQQS's 2.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF	3.26%	3.54%	3.12%	3.45%	3.60%	3.11%	3.70%	3.19%	3.45%	3.19%	2.85%	1.57%
QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF	2.73%	3.48%	0.80%	0.68%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSB and QQQS in my portfolio?

CSB and QQQS have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSB or QQQS?

QQQS has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to CSB (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSB dropped -42.07% vs QQQS's -38.06%.

Which ETF is better, CSB or QQQS?

On 3-year performance, QQQS leads with 15.89% vs 11.48% for CSB. On fees, QQQS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CSB or QQQS?

Over the 3-year period, QQQS has performed better with a 15.89% return vs 11.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSB or QQQS?

QQQS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CSB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSB or QQQS?

CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.73% for QQQS.

What is the main difference between CSB and QQQS?

CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while QQQS tracks Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CSB and 0.20% for QQQS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.