CSB vs. DFMC
CSB (VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) and DFMC (Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. CSB is passively managed, while DFMC is actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DFMC.
Performance
CSB vs. DFMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CSB
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 11.28%
- 6M
- 10.03%
- 1Y
- 20.88%
- 3Y*
- 12.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.69%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
DFMC
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSB vs. DFMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 8.88% |
DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF | 17.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSB and DFMC is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSB vs. DFMC — Risk / Return Rank
CSB
DFMC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CSB vs. DFMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF (DFMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSB | DFMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.44 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSB vs. DFMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSB drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, which is greater than DFMC's maximum drawdown of -4.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSB and DFMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSB | DFMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.07% | -4.29% | -37.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | 0.00% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.11% | -0.74% | -6.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | — | — |
Volatility
CSB vs. DFMC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSB | DFMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.28% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.48% | 16.18% | -1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 16.18% | +2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.31% | 16.18% | +5.13% |
CSB vs. DFMC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DFMC's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSB vs. DFMC - Dividend Comparison
CSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, while DFMC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.22% | 3.54% | 3.12% | 3.45% | 3.60% | 3.11% | 3.70% | 3.19% | 3.45% | 3.19% | 2.85% | 1.57% |
DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSB and DFMC have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DFMC.
CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.00% for DFMC.
They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Dimensional Fund Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CSB and 0.41% for DFMC.
Find the right allocation for CSB and DFMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer