CRWV vs. CIFR
CRWV (CoreWeave, Inc.) and CIFR (Cipher Mining Inc.) are both stocks. CRWV operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while CIFR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past year, CRWV returned -26.96% vs 522.82% for CIFR. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRWV vs. CIFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWV achieves a 42.95% return, which is significantly lower than CIFR's 64.57% return.
CRWV
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- -10.32%
- YTD
- 42.95%
- 6M
- 18.70%
- 1Y
- -26.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFR
- 1D
- 8.20%
- 1M
- 18.20%
- YTD
- 64.57%
- 6M
- 24.69%
- 1Y
- 522.82%
- 3Y*
- 119.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRWV vs. CIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. | 42.95% | 83.62% |
CIFR Cipher Mining Inc. | 64.57% | 481.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWV and CIFR is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025 | 0.48 |
Fundamentals
CRWV:
$53.95B
CIFR:
$9.84B
CRWV:
-$3.27
CIFR:
-$2.33
CRWV:
8.00
CIFR:
53.38
CRWV:
11.34
CIFR:
13.78
CRWV:
$6.23B
CIFR:
$174.98M
CRWV:
$4.32B
CIFR:
-$172.84M
CRWV:
$1.89B
CIFR:
-$169.22M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWV vs. CIFR — Risk / Return Rank
CRWV
CIFR
CRWV vs. CIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRWV | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.45 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 10.27 | -10.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | 20.60 | -21.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRWV | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 | 4.86 | -5.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 0.16 | +0.89 |
Drawdowns
CRWV vs. CIFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWV drawdown since its inception was -64.84%, smaller than the maximum CIFR drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWV and CIFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWV | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.84% | -97.16% | +32.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.84% | -51.38% | -13.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -71.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.24% | -7.61% | -36.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.21% | -66.47% | +29.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.73% | 25.55% | +18.18% |
Volatility
CRWV vs. CIFR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) is 25.28%, while Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) has a volatility of 27.70%. This indicates that CRWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWV | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.28% | 27.70% | -2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.15% | 70.95% | -2.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 95.71% | 108.62% | -12.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 114.59% | 122.03% | -7.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.59% | 122.03% | -7.44% |
Dividends
CRWV vs. CIFR - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRWV nor CIFR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CRWV vs. CIFR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoreWeave, Inc. and Cipher Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWV and CIFR have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIFR has higher volatility (27.70%) compared to CRWV (25.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWV dropped -64.84% vs CIFR's -97.16%.
CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.86 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRWV and CIFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer