PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRWU vs. HOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRWU vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWU achieves a 48.91% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -55.34% return.


CRWU

1D
-5.07%
1M
-33.95%
YTD
48.91%
6M
-4.96%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOOG

1D
12.78%
1M
23.20%
YTD
-55.34%
6M
-70.69%
1Y
-21.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWU vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CRWU
T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF
48.91%-76.87%
HOOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF
-55.34%-10.71%

Correlation

The correlation between CRWU and HOOG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRWU vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWU

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWU vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRWU vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRWUHOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.37

0.41

-0.78

Drawdowns

CRWU vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWU drawdown since its inception was -89.37%, roughly equal to the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWU and HOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRWUHOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.37%

-86.94%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.77%

-79.17%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.57%

-37.70%

-27.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.46%

Volatility

CRWU vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRWUHOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

43.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

191.93%

137.25%

+54.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

191.93%

145.07%

+46.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

191.93%

145.07%

+46.86%

CRWU vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRWU vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

CRWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, less than HOOG's 27.55% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRWU and HOOG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWU.

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 27.55%, compared with 5.71% for CRWU.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWU and 0.75% for HOOG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRWU and HOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer