CRWU vs. TSLT
CRWU (T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF) and TSLT (T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from T-Rex. Both are actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRWU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSLT.
Performance
CRWU vs. TSLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWU achieves a 48.91% return, which is significantly higher than TSLT's -23.81% return.
CRWU
- 1D
- -5.07%
- 1M
- -33.95%
- YTD
- 48.91%
- 6M
- -4.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLT
- 1D
- -2.58%
- 1M
- 12.31%
- YTD
- -23.81%
- 6M
- -27.01%
- 1Y
- 8.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRWU vs. TSLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | 48.91% | -76.87% |
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF | -23.81% | 74.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWU and TSLT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWU vs. TSLT — Risk / Return Rank
CRWU
TSLT
CRWU vs. TSLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) and T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRWU | TSLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.37 | -0.00 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
CRWU vs. TSLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWU drawdown since its inception was -89.37%, which is greater than TSLT's maximum drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWU and TSLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWU | TSLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.37% | -83.16% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -55.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.77% | -62.99% | -14.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.57% | -50.25% | -15.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 26.67% | — |
Volatility
CRWU vs. TSLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWU | TSLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 24.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 54.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 191.93% | 92.43% | +99.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 191.93% | 116.97% | +74.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 191.93% | 116.97% | +74.96% |
CRWU vs. TSLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLT's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWU vs. TSLT - Dividend Comparison
CRWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, while TSLT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | 5.71% | 8.51% |
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWU and TSLT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLT is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLT is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWU.
CRWU has the higher dividend yield at 5.71%, compared with 0.00% for TSLT.
Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWU and 1.05% for TSLT.
Find the right allocation for CRWU and TSLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer