PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRWG vs. BMNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRWG vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWG achieves a 53.84% return, which is significantly higher than BMNG's -75.13% return.


CRWG

1D
-14.04%
1M
-28.24%
YTD
53.84%
6M
13.19%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BMNG

1D
-12.21%
1M
-48.30%
YTD
-75.13%
6M
-85.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWG vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CRWG and BMNG is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.52

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRWG vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRWG vs. BMNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRWGBMNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

-0.52

+0.10

Drawdowns

CRWG vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWG drawdown since its inception was -89.42%, smaller than the maximum BMNG drawdown of -95.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWG and BMNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRWGBMNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.42%

-95.36%

+5.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.02%

-95.36%

+18.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.53%

-81.38%

+12.85%

Volatility

CRWG vs. BMNG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRWGBMNGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

191.73%

191.58%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

191.73%

191.58%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

191.73%

191.58%

+0.15%

CRWG vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CRWG and BMNG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

CRWG vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison

CRWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, while BMNG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRWG and BMNG have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CRWG and BMNG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

CRWG has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 0.00% for BMNG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRWG and BMNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer