CRWG vs. DHS
CRWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF) and DHS (WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CRWG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while DHS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. CRWG is actively managed, while DHS is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. CRWG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for DHS.
Performance
CRWG vs. DHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWG achieves a 48.78% return, which is significantly higher than DHS's 11.70% return.
CRWG
- 1D
- -11.54%
- 1M
- 3.78%
- YTD
- 48.78%
- 6M
- 4.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DHS
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 11.36%
- 1Y
- 21.93%
- 3Y*
- 17.26%
- 5Y*
- 11.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.64%
CRWG vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | 48.78% | -81.81% |
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 11.70% | 5.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWG and DHS is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWG vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank
CRWG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DHS
CRWG vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRWG | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.50 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.69 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRWG vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWG drawdown since its inception was -89.42%, which is greater than DHS's maximum drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWG and DHS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWG | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.42% | -67.25% | -22.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.77% | -1.98% | -75.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.81% | -9.53% | -59.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.73% | — |
Volatility
CRWG vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWG | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 189.49% | 10.19% | +179.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 189.49% | 13.88% | +175.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 189.49% | 16.10% | +173.39% |
CRWG vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DHS's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWG vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison
CRWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than DHS's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | 4.97% | 7.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 3.30% | 3.32% | 3.66% | 4.31% | 3.42% | 3.29% | 4.14% | 3.69% | 3.76% | 3.00% | 3.25% | 3.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWG and DHS have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DHS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DHS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CRWG.
CRWG has the higher dividend yield at 4.97%, compared with 3.30% for DHS.
CRWG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRWG and 0.38% for DHS.
Find the right allocation for CRWG and DHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer