PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMNG vs. BMNU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BMNG vs. BMNU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BMNG vs. BMNU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BMNG
Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF
-63.21%-81.37%
BMNU
T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF
-64.44%-81.83%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BMNG having a -63.21% return and BMNU slightly lower at -64.44%.


BMNG

1D
-3.31%
1M
-10.69%
YTD
-63.21%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BMNU

1D
-2.86%
1M
-10.76%
YTD
-64.44%
6M
-94.62%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BMNG vs. BMNU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BMNU's 1.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BMNG vs. BMNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BMNG vs. BMNU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMNGBMNUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.47

-0.49

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between BMNG and BMNU is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BMNG vs. BMNU - Dividend Comparison

Neither BMNG nor BMNU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BMNG vs. BMNU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMNG drawdown since its inception was -93.85%, roughly equal to the maximum BMNU drawdown of -96.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNG and BMNU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BMNGBMNUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.85%

-96.12%

+2.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.14%

-95.66%

+2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-77.12%

-74.65%

-2.47%

Volatility

BMNG vs. BMNU - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BMNGBMNUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

213.48%

205.45%

+8.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

213.48%

205.45%

+8.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

213.48%

205.45%

+8.03%