CRUX vs. WTIU

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

CRUX (Columbia Core Bond ETF) and WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - CRUX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Columbia Threadneedle, while WTIU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). CRUX is actively managed, while WTIU is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.58, they often move in opposite directions. CRUX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for WTIU.

Performance

CRUX vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CRUX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -0.14%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WTIU

• 1D: 5.65%
• 1M: 24.32%
• 6M: 64.27%
• YTD: 83.64%
• 1Y: 75.42%
• 3Y*: 3.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRUX vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF	0.18%
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	-9.24%

Correlation

The correlation between CRUX and WTIU is -0.58, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026	-0.58

Return for Risk

CRUX vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRUX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WTIU

WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 37
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 37
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRUX vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRUX	WTIU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.09	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.66	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.20	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.58	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.67	—

Drawdowns

CRUX vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRUX drawdown since its inception was -1.85%, smaller than the maximum WTIU drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUX and WTIU.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRUX	WTIU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-75.73%	+73.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-48.11%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-75.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.80%	-34.90%	+34.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.60%	-39.31%	+38.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	20.61%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRUX	WTIU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	21.17%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	57.05%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.98%	69.40%	-65.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.98%	70.90%	-66.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.98%	70.90%	-66.92%

CRUX vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRUX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRUX vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison

CRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, while WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF	1.40%
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRUX and WTIU in my portfolio?

CRUX and WTIU have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRUX or WTIU?

On fees, CRUX is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRUX or WTIU?

CRUX is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTIU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRUX or WTIU?

CRUX has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.

What is the main difference between CRUX and WTIU?

CRUX is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while WTIU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CRUX and 0.95% for WTIU.