PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRUX vs. REGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRUX vs. REGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CRUX

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.14%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

REGS

1D
-0.82%
1M
-0.47%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRUX vs. REGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CRUX and REGS is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRUX vs. REGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRUX vs. REGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRUX vs. REGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRUX drawdown since its inception was -1.85%, smaller than the maximum REGS drawdown of -7.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUX and REGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRUXREGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-7.59%

+5.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-5.59%

+4.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

-2.44%

+1.84%

Volatility

CRUX vs. REGS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRUXREGSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

20.01%

-16.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.98%

20.01%

-16.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.98%

20.01%

-16.03%

CRUX vs. REGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRUX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than REGS's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRUX vs. REGS - Dividend Comparison

CRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, while REGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRUX and REGS have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CRUX is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CRUX is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for REGS.

CRUX has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.00% for REGS.

CRUX is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while REGS is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CRUX and 0.35% for REGS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRUX and REGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer