REGS vs. IUSG
REGS (Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF) and IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. REGS is actively managed, while IUSG is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REGS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IUSG.
Performance
REGS vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
REGS
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUSG
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- 6M
- 10.46%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 22.79%
- 3Y*
- 24.64%
- 5Y*
- 13.46%
- 10Y*
- 17.55%
REGS vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
REGS Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF | 9.85% |
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 16.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between REGS and IUSG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REGS vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank
REGS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IUSG
REGS vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REGS | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.85 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REGS vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REGS drawdown since its inception was -7.59%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGS and IUSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REGS | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.59% | -63.41% | +55.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.84% | -4.01% | -1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.22% | -21.38% | +19.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.28% | — |
Volatility
REGS vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REGS | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.25% | 16.99% | +3.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.25% | 21.09% | -0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.25% | 20.47% | -0.22% |
REGS vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
REGS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
REGS vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison
REGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.59% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.64% | 1.32% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.29% |
REGS Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, REGS and IUSG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for REGS.
IUSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for REGS.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for REGS and 0.04% for IUSG.
Find the right allocation for REGS and IUSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer