PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRTO vs. QNST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRTO vs. QNST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Criteo S.A. (CRTO) and QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRTO achieves a 11.01% return, which is significantly lower than QNST's 16.84% return. Over the past 10 years, CRTO has underperformed QNST with an annualized return of -6.35%, while QNST has yielded a comparatively higher 16.65% annualized return.


CRTO

1D
-1.12%
1M
28.18%
6M
10.69%
YTD
11.01%
1Y
-3.58%
3Y*
-12.71%
5Y*
-12.51%
10Y*
-6.35%

QNST

1D
-0.30%
1M
36.06%
6M
9.88%
YTD
16.84%
1Y
9.31%
3Y*
22.56%
5Y*
-1.77%
10Y*
16.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRTO vs. QNST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRTO
Criteo S.A.
11.01%-47.90%56.24%-2.84%-32.96%89.52%18.35%-23.72%-12.72%-36.64%
QNST
QuinStreet, Inc.
16.84%-37.71%79.95%-10.66%-21.11%-15.16%40.04%-5.67%93.68%122.87%

Correlation

The correlation between CRTO and QNST is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2013

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRTO:

$1.15B

QNST:

$964.51M

EPS

CRTO:

$2.17

QNST:

-$0.52

PS Ratio

CRTO:

0.63

QNST:

0.83

PB Ratio

CRTO:

1.03

QNST:

3.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRTO:

$1.92B

QNST:

$1.18B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRTO:

$1.04B

QNST:

$123.85M

EBITDA (TTM)

CRTO:

$269.43M

QNST:

$21.66M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRTO vs. QNST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRTO
CRTO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
CRTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRTO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
CRTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRTO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

QNST
QNST Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QNST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QNST Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
QNST Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
QNST Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
QNST Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRTO vs. QNST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Criteo S.A. (CRTO) and QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRTOQNSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.07

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

0.19

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.27

0.35

-0.62

CRTO vs. QNST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRTO Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the QNST Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRTO and QNST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRTO vs. QNST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRTO drawdown since its inception was -89.17%, roughly equal to the maximum QNST drawdown of -89.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRTO and QNST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRTOQNSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.17%

-89.10%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.13%

-38.32%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.06%

-58.05%

-10.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.06%

-63.69%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.48%

-72.05%

-16.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.15%

-33.29%

-27.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.27%

-51.36%

+5.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.76%

20.93%

-0.17%

Volatility

CRTO vs. QNST - Volatility Comparison

Criteo S.A. (CRTO) has a higher volatility of 22.85% compared to QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST) at 8.99%. This indicates that CRTO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRTOQNSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.85%

8.99%

+13.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.38%

35.85%

+6.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.79%

45.08%

+3.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.57%

50.22%

-5.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.64%

54.54%

-5.90%

Dividends

CRTO vs. QNST - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRTO nor QNST has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CRTO vs. QNST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Criteo S.A. and QuinStreet, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
424.64M
346.14M
(CRTO) Total Revenue
(QNST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRTO vs. QNST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Criteo S.A. and QuinStreet, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
52.5%
11.9%
Portfolio components
CRTO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Criteo S.A. reported a gross profit of 222.74M and revenue of 424.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.5%.

QNST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, QuinStreet, Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.34M and revenue of 346.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.

CRTO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Criteo S.A. reported an operating income of 10.40M and revenue of 424.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.

QNST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, QuinStreet, Inc. reported an operating income of 10.27M and revenue of 346.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.

CRTO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Criteo S.A. reported a net income of 8.58M and revenue of 424.64M, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.

QNST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, QuinStreet, Inc. reported a net income of -88.46M and revenue of 346.14M, resulting in a net margin of -25.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRTO and QNST have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRTO has higher volatility (22.85%) compared to QNST (8.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRTO dropped -89.17% vs QNST's -89.10%.

QNST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRTO and QNST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer