CRTO vs. EFXT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Criteo S.A. (CRTO) and Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT).

Performance

CRTO vs. EFXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Criteo S.A. (CRTO) and Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRTO vs. EFXT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CRTO Criteo S.A.	-13.00%	-47.90%	56.24%	-2.84%	-32.96%	89.52%	18.35%	-23.72%	-12.72%	-36.64%
EFXT Enerflex Ltd.	35.77%	57.04%	115.79%	-25.13%	5.83%	15.59%	-42.16%	-17.32%	-2.49%	-1.70%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CRTO : $952.23M EFXT : $2.57B
EPS CRTO : $2.63 EFXT : $0.73
PE Ratio CRTO : 6.82 EFXT : 28.78
PEG Ratio CRTO : 0.05 EFXT : 1.01
PS Ratio CRTO : 0.50 EFXT : 0.72
PB Ratio CRTO : 0.83 EFXT : 1.72
Total Revenue (TTM) CRTO : $1.94B EFXT : $3.59B
Gross Profit (TTM) CRTO : $1.05B EFXT : $779.05M
EBITDA (TTM) CRTO : $302.17M EFXT : $432.81M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRTO achieves a -13.00% return, which is significantly lower than EFXT's 35.77% return. Over the past 10 years, CRTO has underperformed EFXT with an annualized return of -8.02%, while EFXT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.39% annualized return.

CRTO

• 1D: 2.69%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: -13.00%
• 6M: -20.66%
• 1Y: -49.36%
• 3Y*: -17.13%
• 5Y*: -13.08%
• 10Y*: -8.02%

EFXT

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: -6.48%
• YTD: 35.77%
• 6M: 94.78%
• 1Y: 173.45%
• 3Y*: 53.85%
• 5Y*: 28.06%
• 10Y*: 12.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CRTO vs. EFXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRTO

CRTO Risk / Return Rank: 7
CRTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CRTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CRTO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CRTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CRTO Martin Ratio Rank: 16

EFXT

EFXT Risk / Return Rank: 97
EFXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
EFXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
EFXT Omega Ratio Rank: 96
EFXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
EFXT Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRTO vs. EFXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Criteo S.A. (CRTO) and Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRTO	EFXT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.17	3.82	-4.99
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.84	3.81	-5.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	1.57	-0.78
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	8.19	-9.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.29	22.89	-24.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRTO vs. EFXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRTO Sharpe Ratio is -1.17, which is lower than the EFXT Sharpe Ratio of 3.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRTO and EFXT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRTO	EFXT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.17	3.82	-4.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.31	0.58	-0.88
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.17	0.26	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.11	0.11	-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between CRTO and EFXT is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CRTO vs. EFXT - Dividend Comparison

CRTO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EFXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRTO Criteo S.A.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EFXT Enerflex Ltd.	0.55%	0.72%	0.82%	1.56%	1.22%	1.14%	2.42%	3.43%	2.13%	2.08%	2.67%	3.55%

Drawdowns

CRTO vs. EFXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRTO drawdown since its inception was -89.17%, which is greater than EFXT's maximum drawdown of -81.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRTO and EFXT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRTO	EFXT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.17%	-81.64%	-7.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.30%	-21.45%	-31.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.47%	-56.16%	-10.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-88.48%	-79.04%	-9.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-69.56%	-10.28%	-59.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.50%	-38.72%	-6.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.73%	7.67%	+30.06%

Volatility

CRTO vs. EFXT - Volatility Comparison

Criteo S.A. (CRTO) and Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) have volatilities of 9.77% and 10.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRTO	EFXT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.77%	10.06%	-0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.57%	33.20%	-5.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.18%	45.74%	-3.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.83%	48.82%	-5.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.63%	48.40%	-0.77%

Financials

CRTO vs. EFXT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Criteo S.A. and Enerflex Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CRTO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Criteo S.A. reported a gross profit of 297.40M and revenue of 541.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.0%.

EFXT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported a gross profit of 166.21M and revenue of 876.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.0%.

CRTO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Criteo S.A. reported an operating income of 72.51M and revenue of 541.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.

EFXT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported an operating income of 85.20M and revenue of 876.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.7%.

CRTO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Criteo S.A. reported a net income of 46.37M and revenue of 541.14M, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.

EFXT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported a net income of -78.39M and revenue of 876.40M, resulting in a net margin of -8.9%.