CRTO vs. EFXT
CRTO (Criteo S.A.) and EFXT (Enerflex Ltd.) are both stocks. CRTO operates in Advertising Agencies (Communication Services), while EFXT operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy). Over the past 10 years, CRTO returned -8.98%/yr vs 13.54%/yr for EFXT. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRTO vs. EFXT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRTO achieves a -15.77% return, which is significantly lower than EFXT's 64.05% return. Over the past 10 years, CRTO has underperformed EFXT with an annualized return of -8.98%, while EFXT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.54% annualized return.
CRTO
- 1D
- 4.77%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- -15.77%
- 6M
- -14.86%
- 1Y
- -26.69%
- 3Y*
- -19.38%
- 5Y*
- -16.79%
- 10Y*
- -8.98%
EFXT
- 1D
- -2.21%
- 1M
- -7.85%
- YTD
- 64.05%
- 6M
- 66.54%
- 1Y
- 227.46%
- 3Y*
- 62.53%
- 5Y*
- 31.81%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
CRTO vs. EFXT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRTO Criteo S.A. | -15.77% | -47.90% | 56.24% | -2.84% | -32.96% | 89.52% | 18.35% | -23.72% | -12.72% | -36.64% |
EFXT Enerflex Ltd. | 64.05% | 57.04% | 115.79% | -25.13% | 5.83% | 15.59% | -42.16% | -17.32% | -2.49% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRTO and EFXT is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2013 | 0.09 |
The correlation between CRTO and EFXT shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.17 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CRTO:
$884.77M
EFXT:
$3.08B
CRTO:
$2.15
EFXT:
$0.97
CRTO:
8.08
EFXT:
26.14
CRTO:
0.05
EFXT:
2.86
CRTO:
0.49
EFXT:
0.99
CRTO:
0.78
EFXT:
2.70
CRTO:
$1.92B
EFXT:
$3.13B
CRTO:
$1.04B
EFXT:
$689.73M
CRTO:
$269.43M
EFXT:
$321.86M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRTO vs. EFXT — Risk / Return Rank
CRTO
EFXT
CRTO vs. EFXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Criteo S.A. (CRTO) and Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRTO | EFXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.70 | -0.79 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 13.88 | -14.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 42.42 | -43.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRTO vs. EFXT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRTO drawdown since its inception was -89.17%, which is greater than EFXT's maximum drawdown of -81.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRTO and EFXT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRTO | EFXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.17% | -81.64% | -7.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.36% | -16.50% | -19.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.06% | -51.26% | -16.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.06% | -56.16% | -11.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.48% | -79.04% | -9.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.53% | -10.96% | -59.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.20% | -38.22% | -7.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.56% | 5.39% | +15.17% |
Volatility
CRTO vs. EFXT - Volatility Comparison
Criteo S.A. (CRTO) and Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) have volatilities of 15.60% and 15.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRTO | EFXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.60% | 15.27% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.20% | 34.88% | +2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.14% | 43.15% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.73% | 49.05% | -5.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.26% | 48.21% | +0.05% |
Dividends
CRTO vs. EFXT - Dividend Comparison
CRTO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EFXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRTO Criteo S.A. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFXT Enerflex Ltd. | 0.47% | 0.72% | 0.82% | 1.56% | 1.22% | 1.14% | 2.42% | 3.43% | 2.13% | 2.08% | 2.67% | 3.55% |
Financials
CRTO vs. EFXT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Criteo S.A. and Enerflex Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRTO vs. EFXT - Profitability Comparison
CRTO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Criteo S.A. reported a gross profit of 222.74M and revenue of 424.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.5%.
EFXT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported a gross profit of 140.03M and revenue of 575.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.3%.
CRTO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Criteo S.A. reported an operating income of 10.40M and revenue of 424.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.
EFXT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported an operating income of 65.09M and revenue of 575.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
CRTO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Criteo S.A. reported a net income of 8.58M and revenue of 424.64M, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.
EFXT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported a net income of 42.40M and revenue of 575.91M, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRTO and EFXT have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRTO has higher volatility (15.60%) compared to EFXT (15.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRTO dropped -89.17% vs EFXT's -81.64%.
EFXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.32 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRTO and EFXT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer