PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QNST vs. BKLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QNST vs. BKLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QNST vs. BKLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QNST
QuinStreet, Inc.
-16.42%-37.71%79.95%-10.66%-21.11%-15.16%159.88%
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
-4.58%18.06%25.56%30.88%-20.52%27.41%37.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QNST achieves a -16.42% return, which is significantly lower than BKLC's -4.58% return.


QNST

1D
-1.48%
1M
2.47%
YTD
-16.42%
6M
-22.37%
1Y
-32.68%
3Y*
-8.87%
5Y*
-10.32%
10Y*
13.28%

BKLC

1D
2.97%
1M
-4.99%
YTD
-4.58%
6M
-2.24%
1Y
18.74%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QNST vs. BKLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QNST
QNST Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
QNST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QNST Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
QNST Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
QNST Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
QNST Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

BKLC
BKLC Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BKLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QNST vs. BKLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QNSTBKLCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.69

1.02

-1.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.79

1.53

-2.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.24

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.74

1.55

-2.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.40

7.24

-8.64

QNST vs. BKLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QNST Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the BKLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QNST and BKLC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QNSTBKLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.69

1.02

-1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

0.70

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.98

-1.01

Correlation

The correlation between QNST and BKLC is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QNST vs. BKLC - Dividend Comparison

QNST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BKLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%.


TTM202520242023202220212020
QNST
QuinStreet, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
1.11%1.05%1.22%1.35%1.64%1.10%0.84%

Drawdowns

QNST vs. BKLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QNST drawdown since its inception was -89.10%, which is greater than BKLC's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNST and BKLC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QNSTBKLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.10%

-26.14%

-62.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.30%

-12.05%

-32.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.33%

-26.14%

-41.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.28%

-6.40%

-45.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.42%

-5.40%

-46.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.54%

2.58%

+20.96%

Volatility

QNST vs. BKLC - Volatility Comparison

QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST) has a higher volatility of 12.42% compared to BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) at 5.41%. This indicates that QNST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QNSTBKLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.42%

5.41%

+7.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.81%

9.69%

+25.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.36%

18.48%

+28.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.69%

17.18%

+32.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.71%

17.59%

+37.12%