CRSH vs. XYLD

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. CRSH is actively managed, while XYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, CRSH returned -7.97% vs 18.65% for XYLD. Their -0.51 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CRSH charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.

Performance

CRSH vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRSH achieves a 21.72% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's 8.89% return.

CRSH

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: 13.05%
• 6M: 14.20%
• YTD: 21.72%
• 1Y: -7.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.35%

XYLD

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 2.61%
• 6M: 7.72%
• YTD: 8.89%
• 1Y: 18.65%
• 3Y*: 12.21%
• 5Y*: 7.93%
• 10Y*: 8.30%
• ALL TIME*: 8.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	$457.04K	$338.01K	$365.84K
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	$31.68M	$34.09M	$32.56M

CRSH vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	21.72%	-13.40%	-52.42%
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	8.89%	8.02%	14.42%

Correlation

The correlation between CRSH and XYLD is -0.58, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024	-0.51

The correlation between CRSH and XYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.58 to -0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CRSH vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRSH

CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 8
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7

XYLD

XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 92
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 95
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRSH vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRSH	XYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	2.67	-2.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.06	3.79	-3.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.60	-0.61
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.26	3.54	-3.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.41	18.41	-18.83

CRSH vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRSH Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRSH and XYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRSH vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and XYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRSH	XYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.68%	-33.46%	-30.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.50%	-5.29%	-25.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.53%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.11%	0.00%	-52.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.01%	-3.67%	-40.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.37%	1.02%	+18.35%

Volatility

CRSH vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) has a higher volatility of 12.40% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 1.93%. This indicates that CRSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRSH	XYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.40%	1.93%	+10.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.58%	5.98%	+20.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.86%	7.09%	+29.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.45%	11.27%	+36.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.45%	14.16%	+33.29%

CRSH vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRSH has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRSH vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 78.07%, more than XYLD's 10.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	78.07%	138.78%	94.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	10.45%	10.51%	11.54%	10.51%	13.43%	9.07%	7.93%	5.76%	7.12%	5.18%	3.23%	4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRSH and XYLD in my portfolio?

CRSH and XYLD have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRSH or XYLD?

CRSH has higher volatility (12.40%) compared to XYLD (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSH dropped -63.68% vs XYLD's -33.46%.

Which ETF is better, CRSH or XYLD?

On 1-year performance, XYLD leads with 18.65% vs -7.97% for CRSH. On fees, XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRSH or XYLD?

Over the 1-year period, XYLD has performed better with a 18.65% return vs -7.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRSH or XYLD?

XYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CRSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRSH or XYLD?

CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 78.07%, compared with 10.45% for XYLD.

What is the main difference between CRSH and XYLD?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CRSH and 0.60% for XYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.