CRSH vs. QQQ

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRSH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. CRSH is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past year, CRSH returned -7.97% vs 28.94% for QQQ. Their -0.61 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CRSH charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.

Performance

CRSH vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRSH achieves a 21.72% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 18.11% return.

CRSH

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: 13.05%
• 6M: 14.20%
• YTD: 21.72%
• 1Y: -7.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.35%

QQQ

• 1D: 3.40%
• 1M: 1.58%
• 6M: 17.69%
• YTD: 18.11%
• 1Y: 28.94%
• 3Y*: 25.56%
• 5Y*: 15.07%
• 10Y*: 20.86%
• ALL TIME*: 10.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	$457.04K	$338.01K	$365.84K
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	$33.34B	$28.86B	$31.95B

CRSH vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	21.72%	-13.40%	-52.42%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	18.11%	20.77%	21.84%

Correlation

The correlation between CRSH and QQQ is -0.65, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024	-0.61

The correlation between CRSH and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.65 to -0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CRSH vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRSH

CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 8
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 55
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 51
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRSH vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRSH	QQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	1.49	-1.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.06	2.07	-2.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.26	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.26	2.43	-2.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.41	7.72	-8.13

CRSH vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRSH Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRSH and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRSH vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and QQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRSH	QQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.68%	-82.97%	+19.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.50%	-11.96%	-18.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.11%	-2.88%	-49.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.01%	-32.61%	-11.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.37%	3.76%	+15.61%

Volatility

CRSH vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) has a higher volatility of 12.40% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 7.63%. This indicates that CRSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRSH	QQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.40%	7.63%	+4.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.58%	16.43%	+10.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.86%	19.61%	+17.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.45%	22.97%	+24.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.45%	22.54%	+24.91%

CRSH vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRSH has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRSH vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 78.07%, more than QQQ's 0.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	78.07%	138.78%	94.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.42%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRSH and QQQ in my portfolio?

CRSH and QQQ have a correlation of -0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRSH or QQQ?

CRSH has higher volatility (12.40%) compared to QQQ (7.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSH dropped -63.68% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

Which ETF is better, CRSH or QQQ?

On 1-year performance, QQQ leads with 28.94% vs -7.97% for CRSH. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRSH or QQQ?

Over the 1-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 28.94% return vs -7.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRSH or QQQ?

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CRSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRSH or QQQ?

CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 78.07%, compared with 0.42% for QQQ.

What is the main difference between CRSH and QQQ?

CRSH is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CRSH and 0.18% for QQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.