CRS vs. FTI
CRS (Carpenter Technology Corporation) and FTI (TechnipFMC plc) are both stocks. CRS operates in Metal Fabrication (Industrials), while FTI operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy). Over the past 10 years, CRS returned 34.84%/yr vs 13.30%/yr for FTI. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRS vs. FTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRS achieves a 86.47% return, which is significantly higher than FTI's 46.47% return. Over the past 10 years, CRS has outperformed FTI with an annualized return of 34.84%, while FTI has yielded a comparatively lower 13.30% annualized return.
CRS
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- 35.09%
- YTD
- 86.47%
- 6M
- 79.45%
- 1Y
- 131.77%
- 3Y*
- 125.83%
- 5Y*
- 72.99%
- 10Y*
- 34.84%
FTI
- 1D
- -2.75%
- 1M
- -8.20%
- YTD
- 46.47%
- 6M
- 45.94%
- 1Y
- 86.16%
- 3Y*
- 65.31%
- 5Y*
- 50.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
CRS vs. FTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 86.47% | 86.23% | 141.72% | 94.48% | 29.50% | 2.66% | -39.44% | 42.12% | -29.16% | 43.40% |
FTI TechnipFMC plc | 46.47% | 54.90% | 44.78% | 66.07% | 105.91% | -15.36% | -55.23% | 12.09% | -36.32% | -11.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRS and FTI is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2001 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CRS and FTI has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
CRS:
$29.50B
FTI:
$26.71B
CRS:
$9.51
FTI:
$2.59
CRS:
61.70
FTI:
25.17
CRS:
0.05
FTI:
0.03
CRS:
9.76
FTI:
2.67
CRS:
14.27
FTI:
7.94
CRS:
$3.03B
FTI:
$10.19B
CRS:
$900.50M
FTI:
$2.75B
CRS:
$745.50M
FTI:
$1.13B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRS vs. FTI — Risk / Return Rank
CRS
FTI
CRS vs. FTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) and TechnipFMC plc (FTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRS | FTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.44 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.08 | 5.60 | +1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.67 | 16.87 | -0.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRS vs. FTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRS drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, smaller than the maximum FTI drawdown of -91.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRS and FTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRS | FTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.68% | -91.74% | +7.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.08% | -15.29% | -3.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.74% | -28.94% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.86% | -41.32% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.70% | -85.71% | +11.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -15.29% | +15.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.22% | -33.90% | +6.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.09% | 5.08% | +3.01% |
Volatility
CRS vs. FTI - Volatility Comparison
Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) has a higher volatility of 10.47% compared to TechnipFMC plc (FTI) at 9.82%. This indicates that CRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRS | FTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.47% | 9.82% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.61% | 21.99% | +11.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.34% | 31.91% | +16.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.61% | 42.42% | +4.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.89% | 47.72% | +1.17% |
Dividends
CRS vs. FTI - Dividend Comparison
CRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than FTI's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 0.14% | 0.25% | 0.47% | 1.13% | 2.17% | 2.74% | 2.75% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 1.41% | 1.99% | 2.38% |
FTI TechnipFMC plc | 0.31% | 0.45% | 0.69% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.38% | 2.43% | 2.66% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CRS vs. FTI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carpenter Technology Corporation and TechnipFMC plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRS vs. FTI - Profitability Comparison
CRS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 251.80M and revenue of 811.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.
FTI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a gross profit of 1.49B and revenue of 2.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.7%.
CRS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 186.50M and revenue of 811.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.
FTI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported an operating income of 351.00M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.
CRS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a net income of 139.60M and revenue of 811.50M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.
FTI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a net income of 260.50M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRS and FTI have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRS has higher volatility (10.47%) compared to FTI (9.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRS dropped -84.68% vs FTI's -91.74%.
CRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRS and FTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer