CRS vs. DBMF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CRS (Carpenter Technology Corporation) is a stock, while DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) is Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. Over the past 5 years, CRS returned 63.90%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for DBMF. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CRS vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRS achieves a 54.86% return, which is significantly higher than DBMF's 12.42% return.

CRS

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 13.90%
• YTD: 54.86%
• 6M: 57.05%
• 1Y: 98.28%
• 3Y*: 116.45%
• 5Y*: 63.90%
• 10Y*: 33.25%

DBMF

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 2.35%
• YTD: 12.42%
• 6M: 14.20%
• 1Y: 31.40%
• 3Y*: 10.81%
• 5Y*: 8.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRS vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation	54.86%	86.23%	141.72%	94.48%	29.50%	2.66%	-39.44%	1.00%
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	12.42%	13.85%	7.24%	-8.94%	21.61%	11.49%	1.80%	10.67%

Correlation

The correlation between CRS and DBMF is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019	0.12

Return for Risk

CRS vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRS

CRS Risk / Return Rank: 88
CRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
CRS Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
CRS Martin Ratio Rank: 90

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 83
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRS vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRS	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	2.59	-0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	3.39	-0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.55	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.18	5.17	+0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.19	19.07	-6.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRS vs. DBMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRS Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRS and DBMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRS	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.08	2.59	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.38	0.68	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.77	-0.43

Drawdowns

CRS vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRS drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRS and DBMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRS	DBMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.68%	-20.39%	-64.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.08%	-6.10%	-12.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.74%	-15.60%	-13.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.04%	-20.39%	-23.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-74.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	0.00%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.26%	-6.59%	-20.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.09%	1.65%	+6.44%

Volatility

CRS vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) has a higher volatility of 12.34% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.12%. This indicates that CRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRS	DBMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.34%	2.12%	+10.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.06%	9.76%	+23.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.57%	12.17%	+35.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.60%	12.52%	+34.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.82%	12.41%	+36.41%

Dividends

CRS vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

CRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than DBMF's 5.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation	0.16%	0.25%	0.47%	1.13%	2.17%	2.74%	2.75%	1.61%	2.13%	1.41%	1.99%	2.38%
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.09%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRS and DBMF in my portfolio?

CRS and DBMF have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRS or DBMF?

CRS has higher volatility (12.34%) compared to DBMF (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRS dropped -84.68% vs DBMF's -20.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.