CRPT vs. ASMH

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF (CRPT) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH).

CRPT and ASMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CRPT is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Sep 20, 2021. ASMH is a passively managed fund by Precidian Funds that tracks the performance of the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. It was launched on Mar 13, 2025.

Performance

CRPT vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF (CRPT) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRPT vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CRPT First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF	-22.19%	5.72%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	29.15%	58.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRPT achieves a -22.19% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 29.15% return.

CRPT

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: -8.32%
• YTD: -22.19%
• 6M: -48.39%
• 1Y: -7.87%
• 3Y*: 34.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASMH

• 1D: 2.68%
• 1M: -3.34%
• YTD: 29.15%
• 6M: 38.05%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRPT vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRPT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

CRPT

First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF

ASMH

ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF

Return for Risk

CRPT vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRPT

CRPT Risk / Return Rank: 12
CRPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
CRPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
CRPT Omega Ratio Rank: 13
CRPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
CRPT Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRPT vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF (CRPT) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRPT	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.29	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.07	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.14	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRPT	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.13	3.14	-3.27

Correlation

The correlation between CRPT and ASMH is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CRPT vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

CRPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than ASMH's 1.26% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CRPT First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF	0.97%	0.75%	1.84%	0.00%	0.03%	1.16%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.26%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CRPT vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRPT drawdown since its inception was -88.34%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRPT and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRPT	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.34%	-15.89%	-72.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.84%	-8.83%	-46.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.95%	-4.45%	-48.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.05%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRPT	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.06%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.90%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.40%	36.81%	+27.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.49%	36.81%	+36.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.49%	36.81%	+36.68%