CRPT vs. BITQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CRPT (First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF) and BITQ (Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRPT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while BITQ is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Index. CRPT is actively managed, while BITQ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CRPT returned 32.74%/yr vs 53.03%/yr for BITQ. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

CRPT vs. BITQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF (CRPT) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRPT achieves a -14.19% return, which is significantly lower than BITQ's 34.62% return.

CRPT

• 1D: -4.17%
• 1M: -11.05%
• YTD: -14.19%
• 6M: -19.90%
• 1Y: -38.88%
• 3Y*: 32.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BITQ

• 1D: -2.61%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 34.62%
• 6M: 25.61%
• 1Y: 49.39%
• 3Y*: 53.03%
• 5Y*: 4.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRPT vs. BITQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CRPT First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF	-14.19%	-9.54%	75.29%	193.86%	-80.84%	-9.59%
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF	34.62%	18.00%	46.97%	246.83%	-83.86%	-4.34%

Correlation

The correlation between CRPT and BITQ is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2021	0.93

The correlation between CRPT and BITQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

CRPT vs. BITQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CRPT	BITQ
Financial Services	70.1%	71.6%
Technology	15.6%	25.5%
Consumer Cyclical	14.3%	2.9%
Communication Services	4.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CRPT vs. BITQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRPT

CRPT Risk / Return Rank: 4
CRPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CRPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CRPT Omega Ratio Rank: 4
CRPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CRPT Martin Ratio Rank: 3

BITQ

BITQ Risk / Return Rank: 25
BITQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
BITQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
BITQ Omega Ratio Rank: 25
BITQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
BITQ Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRPT vs. BITQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF (CRPT) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRPT	BITQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.67	0.87	-1.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.79	1.47	-2.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.17	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.69	1.10	-1.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.15	2.30	-3.45

CRPT vs. BITQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRPT Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the BITQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRPT and BITQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRPT vs. BITQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRPT drawdown since its inception was -88.34%, roughly equal to the maximum BITQ drawdown of -90.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRPT and BITQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRPT	BITQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.34%	-90.32%	+1.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.46%	-44.99%	-11.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.46%	-51.22%	-5.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-90.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.20%	-17.24%	-32.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.56%	-52.52%	-0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.85%	21.50%	+12.35%

Volatility

CRPT vs. BITQ - Volatility Comparison

First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF (CRPT) has a higher volatility of 17.83% compared to Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) at 16.45%. This indicates that CRPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRPT	BITQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.83%	16.45%	+1.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.61%	43.05%	+3.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.13%	56.94%	+1.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.66%	67.32%	+5.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.66%	67.24%	+5.42%

CRPT vs. BITQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CRPT and BITQ have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

CRPT vs. BITQ - Dividend Comparison

CRPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, while BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.90%	1.51%	0.00%	3.12%
CRPT First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF	0.88%	0.75%	1.84%	0.00%	0.03%	1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRPT and BITQ in my portfolio?

CRPT and BITQ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRPT or BITQ?

CRPT has higher volatility (17.83%) compared to BITQ (16.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRPT dropped -88.34% vs BITQ's -90.32%.

Which ETF is better, CRPT or BITQ?

On 3-year performance, BITQ leads with 53.03% vs 32.74% for CRPT. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, BITQ has been the lower-risk option at 16.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRPT or BITQ?

Over the 3-year period, BITQ has performed better with a 53.03% return vs 32.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRPT or BITQ?

CRPT and BITQ have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRPT or BITQ?

CRPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for BITQ.

What is the main difference between CRPT and BITQ?

CRPT is categorized as Technology Equities, while BITQ is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Bitwise.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.