CROX vs. QCLN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CROX (Crocs, Inc.) is a stock, while QCLN (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund) is Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. Over the past 10 years, CROX returned 28.02%/yr vs 17.14%/yr for QCLN. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CROX vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crocs, Inc. (CROX) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CROX achieves a 42.10% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 52.00% return. Over the past 10 years, CROX has outperformed QCLN with an annualized return of 28.02%, while QCLN has yielded a comparatively lower 17.14% annualized return.

CROX

• 1D: 2.57%
• 1M: 18.05%
• YTD: 42.10%
• 6M: 37.72%
• 1Y: 22.74%
• 3Y*: 3.48%
• 5Y*: 3.36%
• 10Y*: 28.02%

QCLN

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 13.54%
• YTD: 52.00%
• 6M: 46.53%
• 1Y: 117.87%
• 3Y*: 12.00%
• 5Y*: 2.04%
• 10Y*: 17.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CROX vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CROX Crocs, Inc.	42.10%	-21.92%	17.26%	-13.85%	-15.43%	104.63%	49.58%	61.24%	105.54%	84.26%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	52.00%	31.81%	-18.86%	-10.02%	-30.37%	-3.21%	184.00%	42.65%	-12.38%	32.34%

Correlation

The correlation between CROX and QCLN is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2007	0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between CROX and QCLN has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CROX vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CROX

CROX Risk / Return Rank: 56
CROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
CROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
CROX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
CROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
CROX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

QCLN

QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 89
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 80
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CROX vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crocs, Inc. (CROX) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CROX	QCLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	3.42	-2.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	3.81	-2.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.47	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.70	7.48	-6.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.19	25.77	-24.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CROX vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CROX Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CROX and QCLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CROX	QCLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44	3.42	-2.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	0.05	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.49	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.20	-0.03

Drawdowns

CROX vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CROX drawdown since its inception was -98.74%, which is greater than QCLN's maximum drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CROX and QCLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CROX	QCLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.74%	-76.18%	-22.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.54%	-15.86%	-16.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-54.04%	-56.08%	+2.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.86%	-69.49%	-4.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.18%	-71.73%	-3.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.70%	-21.47%	-11.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-61.29%	-43.44%	-17.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.17%	4.59%	+14.58%

Volatility

CROX vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crocs, Inc. (CROX) is 11.14%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 12.57%. This indicates that CROX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CROX	QCLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.14%	12.57%	-1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.09%	26.03%	+6.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.49%	34.68%	+17.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.12%	37.96%	+17.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.94%	34.90%	+21.04%

Dividends

CROX vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

CROX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CROX Crocs, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	0.15%	0.25%	0.87%	0.76%	0.33%	0.01%	0.30%	0.85%	1.03%	0.45%	1.24%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CROX and QCLN in my portfolio?

CROX and QCLN have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CROX or QCLN?

QCLN has higher volatility (12.57%) compared to CROX (11.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CROX dropped -98.74% vs QCLN's -76.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.