CRDO vs. LRCX
CRDO (Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd) and LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — CRDO in Semiconductors, LRCX in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials. Over the past 3 years, CRDO returned 130.87%/yr vs 61.40%/yr for LRCX. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
CRDO vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRDO achieves a 43.85% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 71.50% return.
CRDO
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -20.11%
- 6M
- 65.22%
- YTD
- 43.85%
- 1Y
- 85.56%
- 3Y*
- 130.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 87.78%
LRCX
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- -25.11%
- 6M
- 25.75%
- YTD
- 71.50%
- 1Y
- 210.67%
- 3Y*
- 61.40%
- 5Y*
- 37.09%
- 10Y*
- 43.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 23.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.17B | $1.40B | $1.87B | |
| $3.65B | $3.82B | $3.92B |
CRDO vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 43.85% | 114.09% | 245.20% | 46.28% | 10.00% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 71.50% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -28.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRDO and LRCX is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022 | 0.53 |
The correlation between CRDO and LRCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CRDO:
$38.60B
LRCX:
$366.44B
CRDO:
$2.50
LRCX:
$5.75
CRDO:
82.94
LRCX:
50.95
CRDO:
0.07
LRCX:
2.88
CRDO:
29.34
LRCX:
15.93
CRDO:
19.33
LRCX:
29.63
CRDO:
$1.34B
LRCX:
$23.23B
CRDO:
$908.35M
LRCX:
$11.73B
CRDO:
$463.79M
LRCX:
$8.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRDO vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank
CRDO
LRCX
CRDO vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRDO | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.42 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 5.08 | -3.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.65 | 21.44 | -17.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRDO vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRDO drawdown since its inception was -62.04%, smaller than the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDO and LRCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRDO | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.04% | -87.90% | +25.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.59% | -41.76% | -11.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.05% | -47.10% | -13.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.58% | -32.38% | +0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.39% | -28.13% | +8.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.55% | 9.87% | +13.68% |
Volatility
CRDO vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a higher volatility of 29.83% compared to Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) at 27.34%. This indicates that CRDO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRDO | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.83% | 27.34% | +2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 73.09% | 52.39% | +20.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.00% | 63.10% | +28.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.43% | 48.97% | +33.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.43% | 46.20% | +36.23% |
Dividends
CRDO vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison
CRDO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.35% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
Financials
CRDO vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRDO vs. LRCX - Profitability Comparison
CRDO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.
LRCX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.48B and revenue of 6.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.
CRDO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.
LRCX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.51B and revenue of 6.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.4%.
CRDO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.
LRCX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 2.28B and revenue of 6.72B, resulting in a net margin of 33.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRDO and LRCX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRDO has higher volatility (29.83%) compared to LRCX (27.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRDO dropped -62.04% vs LRCX's -87.90%.
LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRDO and LRCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer