CRCO vs. RYLD
CRCO (YieldMax CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF) and RYLD (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. CRCO is actively managed, while RYLD is passively managed. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CRCO charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RYLD.
Performance
CRCO vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRCO achieves a -13.94% return, which is significantly lower than RYLD's 12.29% return.
CRCO
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- -13.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
RYLD
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 1Y
- 24.93%
- 3Y*
- 8.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.15%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $554.17K | $590.63K | $1.39M | |
| $10.07M | $9.36M | $9.08M |
CRCO vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRCO YieldMax CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF | -13.94% | -38.00% |
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | 12.29% | 4.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRCO and RYLD is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRCO vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank
CRCO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RYLD
CRCO vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF (CRCO) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRCO | RYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.67 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRCO vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRCO drawdown since its inception was -61.75%, which is greater than RYLD's maximum drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCO and RYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRCO | RYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.75% | -41.53% | -20.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.61% | -0.37% | -51.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.79% | -8.65% | -27.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.54% | — |
Volatility
CRCO vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRCO | RYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.90% | 10.67% | +73.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.90% | 13.97% | +69.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.90% | 17.04% | +66.86% |
CRCO vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRCO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRCO vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison
CRCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 158.06%, more than RYLD's 11.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRCO YieldMax CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF | 158.06% | 35.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | 11.62% | 12.00% | 12.03% | 12.64% | 13.49% | 12.35% | 10.76% | 6.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRCO and RYLD have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for CRCO.
CRCO has the higher dividend yield at 158.06%, compared with 11.62% for RYLD.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for CRCO and 0.60% for RYLD.
Find the right allocation for CRCO and RYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer