PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRCO vs. CONY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRCO vs. CONY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF (CRCO) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRCO achieves a -12.27% return, which is significantly higher than CONY's -28.89% return.


CRCO

1D
4.65%
1M
1.79%
6M
17.42%
YTD
-12.27%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

CONY

1D
-0.16%
1M
-6.43%
6M
-6.04%
YTD
-28.89%
1Y
-44.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.79M$6.36M$9.84M
$523.45K$576.97K$1.34M

CRCO vs. CONY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CRCO and CONY is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025

0.71

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRCO vs. CONY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRCO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CONY
CONY Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONY Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRCO vs. CONY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF (CRCO) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRCOCONYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.15

CRCO vs. CONY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRCO vs. CONY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRCO drawdown since its inception was -61.75%, roughly equal to the maximum CONY drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCO and CONY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRCOCONYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.75%

-63.57%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.67%

-59.72%

+9.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.94%

-24.27%

-11.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.17%

Volatility

CRCO vs. CONY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRCOCONYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.71%

57.39%

+26.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.71%

59.81%

+23.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.71%

59.81%

+23.90%

CRCO vs. CONY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRCO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than CONY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRCO vs. CONY - Dividend Comparison

CRCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 155.06%, less than CONY's 165.10% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CONY
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
165.10%192.07%155.66%16.43%
CRCO
YieldMax CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF
155.06%35.79%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRCO and CONY have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CONY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CONY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for CRCO.

CONY has the higher dividend yield at 165.10%, compared with 155.06% for CRCO.

Their fees differ too: 1.01% for CRCO and 0.99% for CONY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRCO and CONY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer