PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRC vs. HUBB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRC vs. HUBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in California Resources Corporation (CRC) and Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRC achieves a 28.87% return, which is significantly higher than HUBB's 6.28% return.


CRC

1D
-3.41%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
28.87%
6M
22.22%
1Y
26.74%
3Y*
14.50%
5Y*
14.04%
10Y*

HUBB

1D
0.37%
1M
-3.14%
YTD
6.28%
6M
1.99%
1Y
22.11%
3Y*
16.24%
5Y*
22.43%
10Y*
18.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRC vs. HUBB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CRC
California Resources Corporation
28.87%-10.78%-2.57%28.85%3.69%81.82%18.25%
HUBB
Hubbell Incorporated
6.28%7.43%28.94%42.40%15.08%35.60%6.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CRC and HUBB is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2020

0.22

The correlation between CRC and HUBB shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

CRC:

$4.17

HUBB:

$16.89

PE Ratio

CRC:

13.64

HUBB:

27.78

PS Ratio

CRC:

1.42

HUBB:

4.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRC:

$3.48B

HUBB:

$6.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRC:

$1.30B

HUBB:

$2.13B

EBITDA (TTM)

CRC:

$1.34B

HUBB:

$1.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRC vs. HUBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRC
CRC Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
CRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRC Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

HUBB
HUBB Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
HUBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUBB Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
HUBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUBB Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRC vs. HUBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for California Resources Corporation (CRC) and Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRCHUBBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.15

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

1.28

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.32

3.40

-1.08

CRC vs. HUBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRC Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is comparable to the HUBB Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRC and HUBB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRC vs. HUBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRC drawdown since its inception was -44.75%, which is greater than HUBB's maximum drawdown of -41.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRC and HUBB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRCHUBBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.75%

-41.63%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.04%

-17.36%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.75%

-32.65%

-12.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.75%

-32.65%

-12.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.38%

-15.62%

-2.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.93%

-7.43%

-4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.55%

6.51%

+5.04%

Volatility

CRC vs. HUBB - Volatility Comparison

California Resources Corporation (CRC) has a higher volatility of 9.92% compared to Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) at 8.30%. This indicates that CRC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRCHUBBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.92%

8.30%

+1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.69%

22.61%

+5.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.48%

28.80%

+6.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.42%

29.22%

+11.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.70%

28.79%

+15.91%

Dividends

CRC vs. HUBB - Dividend Comparison

CRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than HUBB's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CRC
California Resources Corporation
2.82%3.51%2.69%2.12%1.82%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HUBB
Hubbell Incorporated
1.19%1.21%1.19%1.39%1.82%1.92%2.37%2.32%3.17%2.12%2.22%

Financials

CRC vs. HUBB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between California Resources Corporation and Hubbell Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B20222023202420252026
871.00M
1.52B
(CRC) Total Revenue
(HUBB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRC vs. HUBB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between California Resources Corporation and Hubbell Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
35.5%
33.3%
Portfolio components
CRC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, California Resources Corporation reported a gross profit of 309.00M and revenue of 871.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.

HUBB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hubbell Incorporated reported a gross profit of 505.30M and revenue of 1.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.

CRC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, California Resources Corporation reported an operating income of 159.00M and revenue of 871.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.3%.

HUBB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hubbell Incorporated reported an operating income of 263.80M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

CRC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, California Resources Corporation reported a net income of 12.00M and revenue of 871.00M, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.

HUBB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hubbell Incorporated reported a net income of 181.80M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRC and HUBB have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRC has higher volatility (9.92%) compared to HUBB (8.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRC dropped -44.75% vs HUBB's -41.63%.

HUBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRC and HUBB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer