HUBB vs. VRT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT).

Performance

HUBB vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HUBB vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HUBB Hubbell Incorporated	10.80%	7.43%	28.94%	42.40%	15.08%	35.60%	8.89%	52.88%	-16.01%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	54.71%	42.80%	136.82%	251.81%	-45.25%	33.80%	69.36%	12.55%	-0.51%

Fundamentals

Market Cap HUBB : $26.29B VRT : $98.15B
EPS HUBB : $16.64 VRT : $3.41
PE Ratio HUBB : 29.50 VRT : 73.44
PEG Ratio HUBB : 1.22 VRT : 0.32
PS Ratio HUBB : 4.51 VRT : 13.32
PB Ratio HUBB : 6.81 VRT : 24.90
Total Revenue (TTM) HUBB : $5.84B VRT : $7.35B
Gross Profit (TTM) HUBB : $2.07B VRT : $736.40M
EBITDA (TTM) HUBB : $1.34B VRT : $2.05B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUBB achieves a 10.80% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 54.71% return.

HUBB

• 1D: 3.95%
• 1M: -4.08%
• YTD: 10.80%
• 6M: 14.73%
• 1Y: 50.14%
• 3Y*: 28.03%
• 5Y*: 22.81%
• 10Y*: 18.77%

VRT

• 1D: 6.98%
• 1M: -1.67%
• YTD: 54.71%
• 6M: 66.20%
• 1Y: 247.49%
• 3Y*: 159.97%
• 5Y*: 64.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

HUBB vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUBB

HUBB Risk / Return Rank: 86
HUBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
HUBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
HUBB Omega Ratio Rank: 81
HUBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
HUBB Martin Ratio Rank: 90

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 98
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 95
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUBB vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HUBB	VRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	3.97	-2.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	3.91	-1.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.52	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	9.60	-6.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.68	27.88	-17.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HUBB vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUBB Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUBB and VRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HUBB	VRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	3.97	-2.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	1.06	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.97	-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between HUBB and VRT is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HUBB vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

HUBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than VRT's 0.08% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
HUBB Hubbell Incorporated	1.12%	1.21%	1.19%	1.39%	1.82%	1.92%	2.37%	2.32%	3.17%	2.12%	2.22%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.08%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HUBB vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUBB drawdown since its inception was -41.63%, smaller than the maximum VRT drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUBB and VRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUBB	VRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.63%	-71.24%	+29.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.80%	-24.78%	+10.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.65%	-71.24%	+38.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.79%	-9.26%	+2.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.40%	-16.47%	+9.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.65%	8.53%	-3.88%

Volatility

HUBB vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is 12.22%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 20.14%. This indicates that HUBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HUBB	VRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.22%	20.14%	-7.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.61%	45.36%	-23.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.35%	62.91%	-31.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.82%	61.08%	-32.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.53%	54.59%	-26.06%

Financials