PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRBN vs. VEGN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRBN vs. VEGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) and US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRBN achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly lower than VEGN's 31.05% return.


CRBN

1D
0.18%
1M
4.24%
YTD
11.12%
6M
12.10%
1Y
27.38%
3Y*
21.37%
5Y*
11.14%
10Y*
12.75%

VEGN

1D
-0.76%
1M
15.42%
YTD
31.05%
6M
31.49%
1Y
48.83%
3Y*
29.78%
5Y*
16.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRBN vs. VEGN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CRBN
iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF
11.12%21.85%19.29%22.31%-19.12%18.82%16.83%8.95%
VEGN
US Vegan Climate ETF
31.05%13.71%25.42%38.10%-26.87%26.01%27.72%9.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CRBN and VEGN is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2019

0.92

The correlation between CRBN and VEGN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

CRBN vs. VEGN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CRBN
VEGN

Technology

32.3%
56.2%

Financial Services

18.3%
15.8%

Communication Services

9.6%
10.7%

Industrials

9.4%
5.7%

Healthcare

8.1%
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
0.0%

Real Estate

2.9%
3.7%

Basic Materials

2.5%
0.1%

Energy

2.2%

-

Utilities

2.2%
0.1%

Technology

CRBN
32.3%
VEGN
56.2%

Financial Services

CRBN
18.3%
VEGN
15.8%

Communication Services

CRBN
9.6%
VEGN
10.7%

Industrials

CRBN
9.4%
VEGN
5.7%

Healthcare

CRBN
8.1%
VEGN
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

CRBN
7.7%
VEGN
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

CRBN
4.4%
VEGN
0.0%

Real Estate

CRBN
2.9%
VEGN
3.7%

Basic Materials

CRBN
2.5%
VEGN
0.1%

Energy

CRBN
2.2%
VEGN

-

Utilities

CRBN
2.2%
VEGN
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRBN vs. VEGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRBN
CRBN Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CRBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRBN Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CRBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRBN Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

VEGN
VEGN Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VEGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEGN Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
VEGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEGN Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRBN vs. VEGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) and US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRBNVEGNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.51

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

4.14

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.06

16.87

-4.82

CRBN vs. VEGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRBN Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is lower than the VEGN Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRBN and VEGN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRBNVEGNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

3.01

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.82

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.86

-0.16

Drawdowns

CRBN vs. VEGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRBN drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, roughly equal to the maximum VEGN drawdown of -34.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRBN and VEGN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRBNVEGNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.13%

-34.14%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

-11.85%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.60%

-20.91%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.04%

-33.40%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-1.39%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-7.58%

+2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

2.90%

-0.62%

Volatility

CRBN vs. VEGN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) is 3.67%, while US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) has a volatility of 6.16%. This indicates that CRBN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRBNVEGNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

6.16%

-2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.52%

13.42%

-2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.05%

16.28%

-3.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.09%

20.26%

-4.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.90%

22.76%

-5.86%

CRBN vs. VEGN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRBN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than VEGN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRBN vs. VEGN - Dividend Comparison

CRBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than VEGN's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRBN
iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF
1.99%2.21%1.94%2.01%1.95%1.57%1.41%2.27%2.51%2.05%2.27%2.01%
VEGN
US Vegan Climate ETF
0.45%0.51%0.51%0.67%0.81%0.41%0.71%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRBN and VEGN have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEGN has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to CRBN (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRBN dropped -33.13% vs VEGN's -34.14%.

On 5-year performance, VEGN leads with 16.52% vs 11.14% for CRBN. On fees, CRBN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CRBN has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VEGN has performed better with a 16.52% return vs 11.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CRBN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for VEGN.

CRBN has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.45% for VEGN.

CRBN tracks MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index, while VEGN tracks US Vegan Climate Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Beyond Investing. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CRBN and 0.60% for VEGN.

VEGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRBN and VEGN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer