CRBN vs. QARP

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CRBN (iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - CRBN tracks the MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index while QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CRBN returned 10.86%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for QARP. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CRBN charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.

Performance

CRBN vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRBN achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 12.78% return.

CRBN

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -0.67%
• 6M: 7.60%
• YTD: 10.05%
• 1Y: 21.17%
• 3Y*: 18.78%
• 5Y*: 10.86%
• 10Y*: 12.49%

QARP

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 1.10%
• 6M: 9.34%
• YTD: 12.78%
• 1Y: 25.00%
• 3Y*: 17.33%
• 5Y*: 12.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRBN vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CRBN iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF	10.05%	21.85%	19.29%	22.31%	-19.12%	18.82%	16.83%	28.65%	-9.30%
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF	12.78%	13.99%	18.94%	23.03%	-14.62%	31.82%	14.83%	30.70%	-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between CRBN and QARP is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018	0.90

The correlation between CRBN and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

CRBN vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CRBN	QARP
Technology	33.3%	23.5%
Financial Services	17.2%	12.1%
Industrials	9.4%	8.5%
Communication Services	9.3%	11.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.0%	9.6%
Healthcare	7.9%	13.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	9.6%
Basic Materials	3.1%	2.3%
Energy	3.0%	5.8%
Utilities	2.4%	2.0%
Real Estate	2.1%	1.0%

Return for Risk

CRBN vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRBN

CRBN Risk / Return Rank: 56
CRBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
CRBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
CRBN Omega Ratio Rank: 55
CRBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CRBN Martin Ratio Rank: 63

QARP

QARP Risk / Return Rank: 87
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRBN vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRBN	QARP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	2.38	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	3.34	-1.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.43	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.11	3.46	-1.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.93	15.38	-6.45

CRBN vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRBN Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRBN and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRBN vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRBN drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, smaller than the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRBN and QARP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRBN	QARP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.13%	-35.44%	+2.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.08%	-7.26%	-2.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.60%	-15.65%	-0.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.04%	-22.75%	-4.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.60%	0.00%	-1.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.17%	-4.39%	-0.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	1.63%	+0.75%

Volatility

CRBN vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that CRBN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRBN	QARP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.06%	2.76%	+1.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.74%	8.22%	+3.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.89%	10.58%	+3.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.24%	15.54%	+0.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.84%	19.55%	-2.71%

CRBN vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRBN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CRBN vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

CRBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than QARP's 1.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRBN iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF	2.03%	2.21%	1.94%	2.01%	1.95%	1.57%	1.41%	2.27%	2.51%	2.05%	2.27%	2.01%
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF	1.02%	1.14%	1.39%	1.28%	1.68%	1.34%	1.61%	1.85%	1.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRBN and QARP in my portfolio?

CRBN and QARP have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRBN or QARP?

CRBN has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRBN dropped -33.13% vs QARP's -35.44%.

Which ETF is better, CRBN or QARP?

On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 12.09% vs 10.86% for CRBN. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRBN or QARP?

Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 12.09% return vs 10.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRBN or QARP?

QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CRBN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRBN or QARP?

CRBN has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 1.02% for QARP.

What is the main difference between CRBN and QARP?

CRBN tracks MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CRBN and 0.19% for QARP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.