CRBN vs. BIBL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CRBN (iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF) and BIBL (Inspire 100 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - CRBN tracks the MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index while BIBL tracks the Inspire 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CRBN returned 10.57%/yr vs 10.30%/yr for BIBL. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CRBN charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BIBL.

Performance

CRBN vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRBN achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly lower than BIBL's 24.57% return.

CRBN

• 1D: -2.26%
• 1M: -0.57%
• YTD: 8.70%
• 6M: 8.00%
• 1Y: 23.95%
• 3Y*: 20.07%
• 5Y*: 10.57%
• 10Y*: 12.97%

BIBL

• 1D: -2.18%
• 1M: 4.42%
• YTD: 24.57%
• 6M: 23.10%
• 1Y: 40.13%
• 3Y*: 22.41%
• 5Y*: 10.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRBN vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CRBN iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF	8.70%	21.85%	19.29%	22.31%	-19.12%	18.82%	16.83%	28.65%	-9.80%	3.52%
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	24.57%	17.27%	12.49%	17.87%	-23.26%	27.44%	22.62%	29.68%	-7.64%	4.42%

Correlation

The correlation between CRBN and BIBL is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2017	0.89

The correlation between CRBN and BIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

CRBN vs. BIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CRBN	BIBL
Technology	33.3%	31.9%
Financial Services	17.2%	8.5%
Industrials	9.4%	27.2%
Communication Services	9.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.0%	0.3%
Healthcare	7.9%	4.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	0.4%
Basic Materials	3.1%	4.3%
Energy	3.0%	6.0%
Utilities	2.4%	3.3%
Real Estate	2.1%	13.7%

Return for Risk

CRBN vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRBN

CRBN Risk / Return Rank: 55
CRBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
CRBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
CRBN Omega Ratio Rank: 54
CRBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
CRBN Martin Ratio Rank: 61

BIBL

BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 82
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 76
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRBN vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRBN	BIBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	2.45	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	3.25	-0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.42	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	4.51	-2.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.28	19.18	-8.90

CRBN vs. BIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRBN Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the BIBL Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRBN and BIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRBN vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRBN drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, smaller than the maximum BIBL drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRBN and BIBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRBN	BIBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.13%	-36.12%	+2.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.08%	-8.94%	-1.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.60%	-20.60%	+4.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.04%	-30.85%	+3.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.81%	-2.18%	-0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.19%	-7.00%	+1.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.34%	2.10%	+0.24%

Volatility

CRBN vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) is 5.39%, while Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that CRBN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRBN	BIBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.39%	6.91%	-1.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.55%	13.67%	-2.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.81%	16.47%	-2.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.23%	19.76%	-3.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.88%	21.11%	-4.23%

CRBN vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRBN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRBN vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

CRBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than BIBL's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	0.95%	1.01%	0.92%	1.02%	0.98%	17.87%	1.67%	1.30%	1.49%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%
CRBN iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF	2.05%	2.21%	1.94%	2.01%	1.95%	1.57%	1.41%	2.27%	2.51%	2.05%	2.27%	2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRBN and BIBL in my portfolio?

CRBN and BIBL have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRBN or BIBL?

BIBL has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to CRBN (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRBN dropped -33.13% vs BIBL's -36.12%.

Which ETF is better, CRBN or BIBL?

On 5-year performance, CRBN leads with 10.57% vs 10.30% for BIBL. On fees, CRBN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CRBN has been the lower-risk option at 5.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRBN or BIBL?

Over the 5-year period, CRBN has performed better with a 10.57% return vs 10.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRBN or BIBL?

CRBN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BIBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRBN or BIBL?

CRBN has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 0.95% for BIBL.

What is the main difference between CRBN and BIBL?

CRBN tracks MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index, while BIBL tracks Inspire 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CRBN and 0.35% for BIBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.