PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRAK vs. XES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRAK vs. XES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRAK achieves a 33.23% return, which is significantly lower than XES's 50.69% return. Over the past 10 years, CRAK has outperformed XES with an annualized return of 13.28%, while XES has yielded a comparatively lower -2.47% annualized return.


CRAK

1D
0.56%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
33.23%
6M
27.96%
1Y
67.58%
3Y*
22.78%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
13.28%

XES

1D
-0.56%
1M
-4.59%
YTD
50.69%
6M
43.67%
1Y
97.14%
3Y*
19.81%
5Y*
13.75%
10Y*
-2.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRAK vs. XES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF
33.23%39.11%-15.05%13.73%19.10%10.90%-11.22%9.15%-10.46%49.86%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
50.69%5.89%-5.44%6.68%62.03%12.00%-43.38%-9.00%-46.99%-21.93%

Correlation

The correlation between CRAK and XES is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2015

0.62

The correlation between CRAK and XES shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CRAK vs. XES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CRAK
XES

Energy

98.9%
97.5%

Industrials

4.0%
2.5%

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

CRAK
98.9%
XES
97.5%

Industrials

CRAK
4.0%
XES
2.5%

Basic Materials

CRAK
1.1%
XES

-

Communication Services

CRAK

-

XES

-

Consumer Cyclical

CRAK

-

XES

-

Consumer Defensive

CRAK

-

XES

-

Financial Services

CRAK

-

XES

-

Healthcare

CRAK

-

XES

-

Real Estate

CRAK

-

XES

-

Technology

CRAK

-

XES

-

Utilities

CRAK

-

XES

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRAK vs. XES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRAK
CRAK Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

XES
XES Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
XES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XES Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XES Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XES Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
XES Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRAK vs. XES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRAKXESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.48

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.93

9.93

-2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.48

26.79

-4.31

CRAK vs. XES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRAK Sharpe Ratio is 3.70, which is comparable to the XES Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRAK and XES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRAKXESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70

3.23

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.35

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

-0.05

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

-0.07

+0.61

Drawdowns

CRAK vs. XES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRAK drawdown since its inception was -58.80%, smaller than the maximum XES drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRAK and XES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRAKXESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.80%

-95.65%

+36.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.57%

-9.84%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.61%

-45.95%

+10.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.61%

-45.95%

+10.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.80%

-91.23%

+32.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.81%

-70.90%

+67.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.50%

-54.36%

+41.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

3.64%

-0.62%

Volatility

CRAK vs. XES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) is 6.74%, while SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that CRAK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRAKXESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.74%

8.22%

-1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.27%

20.52%

-6.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.35%

30.50%

-12.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.61%

39.04%

-18.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.16%

45.04%

-22.88%

CRAK vs. XES - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRAK has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than XES's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRAK vs. XES - Dividend Comparison

CRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than XES's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF
1.51%2.02%5.60%3.65%3.08%2.40%2.64%1.49%2.42%1.66%3.42%0.47%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
1.12%1.69%1.31%0.66%0.36%1.81%1.33%1.43%1.14%1.68%0.64%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRAK and XES have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XES has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to CRAK (6.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRAK dropped -58.80% vs XES's -95.65%.

On 10-year performance, CRAK leads with 13.28% vs -2.47% for XES. On fees, XES is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRAK has been the lower-risk option at 6.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CRAK has performed better with a 13.28% return vs -2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XES is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for CRAK.

CRAK has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 1.12% for XES.

CRAK tracks MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index, while XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for CRAK and 0.35% for XES.

CRAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 3.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRAK and XES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer