CRAK vs. FLTR
CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF) and FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRAK is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index, while FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CRAK returned 13.28%/yr vs 3.51%/yr for FLTR. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRAK charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.
Performance
CRAK vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRAK achieves a 33.23% return, which is significantly higher than FLTR's 1.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CRAK has outperformed FLTR with an annualized return of 13.28%, while FLTR has yielded a comparatively lower 3.51% annualized return.
CRAK
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -1.83%
- YTD
- 33.23%
- 6M
- 27.96%
- 1Y
- 67.58%
- 3Y*
- 22.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.28%
FLTR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- 6.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- 3.51%
CRAK vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 33.23% | 39.11% | -15.05% | 13.73% | 19.10% | 10.90% | -11.22% | 9.15% | -10.46% | 49.86% |
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 1.91% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% | 0.55% | 1.44% | 5.70% | 0.30% | 2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRAK and FLTR is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2015 | 0.12 |
The correlation between CRAK and FLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRAK vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
CRAK
FLTR
CRAK vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRAK | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 3.15 | -1.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.93 | 16.96 | -9.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.48 | 101.23 | -78.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRAK | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70 | 6.77 | -3.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 2.11 | -1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.70 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.53 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
CRAK vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRAK drawdown since its inception was -58.80%, which is greater than FLTR's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRAK and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRAK | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.80% | -17.84% | -40.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.57% | -0.31% | -8.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.61% | -1.93% | -33.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.61% | -3.06% | -32.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.80% | -17.84% | -40.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.81% | -0.04% | -3.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.50% | -0.67% | -11.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 0.05% | +2.97% |
Volatility
CRAK vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.25%. This indicates that CRAK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRAK | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.74% | 0.25% | +6.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.27% | 0.62% | +13.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.35% | 0.79% | +17.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 2.13% | +18.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.16% | 5.00% | +17.16% |
CRAK vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRAK has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRAK vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
CRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than FLTR's 4.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 1.51% | 2.02% | 5.60% | 3.65% | 3.08% | 2.40% | 2.64% | 1.49% | 2.42% | 1.66% | 3.42% | 0.47% |
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.73% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRAK and FLTR have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRAK has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to FLTR (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRAK dropped -58.80% vs FLTR's -17.84%.
On 10-year performance, CRAK leads with 13.28% vs 3.51% for FLTR. On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, FLTR has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CRAK has performed better with a 13.28% return vs 3.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for CRAK.
FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 1.51% for CRAK.
CRAK is categorized as Energy Equities, while FLTR is Corporate Bonds. CRAK tracks MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index, while FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for CRAK and 0.14% for FLTR.
FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.77 vs 3.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRAK and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer