CQTM vs. STHH
CQTM (Corgi Quantum Computing ETF) and STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) are both Technology Equities funds. CQTM is actively managed, while STHH is passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CQTM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for STHH.
Performance
CQTM vs. STHH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CQTM
- 1D
- -5.65%
- 1M
- -23.03%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STHH
- 1D
- -7.18%
- 1M
- -14.31%
- 6M
- 127.36%
- YTD
- 148.48%
- 1Y
- 104.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CQTM vs. STHH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CQTM Corgi Quantum Computing ETF | -15.10% |
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 12.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between CQTM and STHH is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CQTM vs. STHH — Risk / Return Rank
CQTM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
STHH
CQTM vs. STHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CQTM | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.09 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CQTM vs. STHH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CQTM drawdown since its inception was -32.33%, roughly equal to the maximum STHH drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQTM and STHH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CQTM | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.33% | -33.89% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.33% | -20.65% | -11.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.51% | -10.22% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.21% | — |
Volatility
CQTM vs. STHH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CQTM | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 20.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 43.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.21% | 54.44% | +30.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.21% | 52.31% | +32.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 85.21% | 52.31% | +32.90% |
CQTM vs. STHH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CQTM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than STHH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
CQTM vs. STHH - Dividend Comparison
CQTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CQTM Corgi Quantum Computing ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 0.81% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CQTM and STHH have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CQTM.
STHH has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.00% for CQTM.
They also come from different issuers: Corgi Funds and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CQTM and 0.19% for STHH.
Find the right allocation for CQTM and STHH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer